Paul Schreiber blogs about the tech behind the websites of presidential candidates. "So, you want to run a country. Can you hire someone who can run a website? ...Here's how the (declared) candidates' sites fare." There's a table comparing 4 candidates' sites based on HTTPS, URL permutations, IPv6, SSL rating, and other related qualities. Schreiber mentions that he will "update this as more candidates declare or sites change."
From the blog comments
HillaryClinton.com was using IIS (and no https) until Sunday morning, when they switched over.
Are you trying to be funny?
No, he tries to show that operating systems from Microsoft puts the user in impossible situations and generally causes problems than need not to be. So one should not use it.
You've been Poe'd. Read the last sentence again.
Once upon a midnight dreary,while I pondered, weak and weary,Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore,While I nodded, nearly napping,suddenly there came a tapping,As of some one gently rapping,rapping at my chamber door.Quoth Ethanol-fueled,"Suck my rock hard cock you dirty skanky whore!"