janrinok writes:
"Research carried out the the University of New South Wales (Australia) reveals that consuming a diet low in nutrients might, under certain circumstances, actually lead to a longer life."
The article continues:
Scientists have known for decades that severely restricted food intake reduces the incidence of diseases of old age, such as cancer, and increases lifespan.
'This effect has been demonstrated in laboratories around the world, in species ranging from yeast to flies to mice. There is also some evidence that it occurs in primates,' says lead author, Dr Margo Adler, an evolutionary biologist at UNSW Australia.
The most widely accepted theory is that this effect evolved to improve survival during times of famine. 'But we think that lifespan extension from dietary restriction is more likely to be a laboratory artifact,' says Dr Adler. Lifespan extension is unlikely to occur in the wild, because dietary restriction compromises the immune system's ability to fight off disease and reduces the muscle strength necessary to flee a predator.
(Score: 2) by nitehawk214 on Tuesday March 18 2014, @12:50PM
I think you have the theory down here. It is far more complicated than "eat lots, life short vs. slow metabolism is long life". This much has been known for decades. It's all about choosing your spots when consuming.
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh