SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
elias writes:
"A very public and sometimes acrimonious dispute in the Debian ecosystem about upstart versus systemd has been settled in favour of systemd. Some go as far as to brand it a new era after the Linux civil war [Beware popups].
We also had an asksoylentnews question on what the fuzz was all about. But what can upstart contribute to systemd now the war is over, or will it simply be a technology that we remember fondly, but do not see any more in a few years time?"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Ubuntu Concedes Defeat in Upstart vs Systemd
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 41 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
There's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by edIII on Wednesday March 19 2014, @12:53AM
Thank you. I don't care that it's 30 days old.
I don't know anything about it, and quite frankly, I wish some people around here that understood it could compare and contrast Upstart and SystemD for me and possibly tell me why it was such a big deal in the first place.
For there to be so much emotion, especially from techies, I know the pros and cons on either side must have been huge.
So what were they?
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.