SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This is a topic that comes up all too often in comments, lambasting editors or praising them.
As it stands, editorial is a black box, they accept submissions, fettle them, then they appear as stories. Recently, the Original Submission link appeared on stories so you can see what went in and what appeared out of that black box, yet still the complaints come.
Just how much transparency is necessary? (This is an open question not rhetorical)
I like to believe that SoylentNews is the people that form it as a community, and the editing should reflect that.
Should we adopt some version control for subs so everyone can see who edited what through the pipeline that goes from sub to front page?
Thoughts on a postcard please.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
META: Editorial Transparency - What do you want?
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 93 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.
(Score: 2) by juggs on Sunday May 31 2015, @02:36AM
It is all too easy to allow focus to be drawn by the noisy 1%, that was my mistake right here. It's also easy to forget that if the other 99% aren't jumping up and down screaming, thinks are most likely A-OK.
Still, it is good to see some affirmation for the Editors that put time in every day to keep the front page populated.