Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Friday March 28 2014, @11:40PM   Printer-friendly
from the law-enforcement-needs-more-laws dept.

janrinok writes:

The WSJ is reporting that the U.S. Department of Justice is pushing to make it easier for law enforcement to get warrants to hack into the computers of criminal suspects across the country. The move, which would alter federal court rules governing search warrants, comes amid increases in cases related to computer crimes. Investigators say they need more flexibility to get warrants to allow hacking in such cases, especially when multiple computers are involved or the government doesn't know where the suspect's computer is physically located.

From the article:

The Justice Department effort is raising questions among some technology advocates, who say the government should focus on fixing the holes in computer software that allow such hacking instead of exploiting them. Privacy advocates also warn government spyware could end up on innocent people's computers if remote attacks are authorized against equipment whose ownership isn't clear.

The government's hacking tools such as sending an email embedded with code that installs spying software resemble those used by criminal hackers (sic). The government doesn't describe these methods as hacking (sic), preferring instead to use terms like "remote access" and "network investigative techniques".

Ars Technica cover the same story but offer some useful analysis of the subject.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday March 28 2014, @11:47PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday March 28 2014, @11:47PM (#22755) Homepage

    From the summary:

    "...Privacy advocates also warn government spyware could end up on innocent people's computers if remote attacks are authorized against equipment whose ownership isn't clear. "

    Well, we couldn't track down the operator of that botnet, but one of the infected computers belongs to a guy who posted a racial slur online. That means he has guns, so we need a no-knock warrant. Let's search his house and confiscate his nazi flags. And make sure we reveal to the courtroom that he was cheating on his wife during the trial phase.

    *racks slide, click click etc.*

    And if his dog tries to lick my hand I'm gonna shoot that furry fucker dead.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2