Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday September 22 2015, @07:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the greed dept.

Medicine that costs $1 to make raised in price from $13.50 to $750.00

The head of a US pharmaceutical company has defended his company's decision to raise the price of a 62-year-old medication used by Aids patients by over 5,000%. Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired the rights to Daraprim in August.

CEO Martin Shkreli has said that the company will use the money it makes from sales to research new treatments. The drug is used treat toxoplasmosis, a parasitic affliction that affects people with compromised immune systems.

After Turning's acquisition, a dose of Daraprim in the US increased from $13.50 (£8.70) to $750. The pill costs about $1 to produce, but Mr Shkreli, a former hedge fund manager, said that does not include other costs like marketing and distribution.

Cost of Daraprim Medication Raised By Over 50 Times

BBC is reporting on a massive price hike of an essential drug used by AIDS patients:

The head of a US pharmaceutical company has defended his company's decision to raise the price of a 62-year-old medication used by Aids patients by over 5,000%. Turing Pharmaceuticals acquired the rights to Daraprim in August. CEO Martin Shkreli has said that the company will use the money it makes from sales to research new treatments.

The drug is used treat toxoplasmosis, a parasitic affliction that affects people with compromised immune systems. After Turning's acquisition, a dose of Daraprim in the US increased from $13.50 (£8.70) to $750. The pill costs about $1 to produce, but Mr Shkreli, a former hedge fund manager, said that does not include other costs like marketing and distribution. "We needed to turn a profit on this drug," Mr Shkreli told Bloomberg TV. "The companies before us were just giving it away almost." On Twitter, Mr Shkreli mocked several users who questioned the company's decision, calling one reporter "a moron".

Why not switch to a generic pyrimethamine tablet? They don't exist right now, according to the New York Times (story includes examples of other recent price hikes):

With the price now high, other companies could conceivably make generic copies, since patents have long expired. One factor that could discourage that option is that Daraprim's distribution is now tightly controlled, making it harder for generic companies to get the samples they need for the required testing.

The switch from drugstores to controlled distribution was made in June by Impax, not by Turing. Still, controlled distribution was a strategy Mr. Shkreli talked about at his previous company as a way to thwart generics.

The drug is also used to treat malaria and appears on the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines. Toxoplasmosis infections are a feline gift to the world.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Wednesday September 23 2015, @08:41AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Wednesday September 23 2015, @08:41AM (#240443) Journal
    Patents describe what is required to reproduce the invention, however invention and product are different things. For example, if I invent a new kind of axel baring, I may then sell a new kind of wheel that includes it and keep some other parts of the design as trade secrets. When the patent expires, someone else would have to reverse engineer the parts that are trade secrets to be able to sell an equivalent wheel. It's not uncommon to use a mixture of trade secrets and patents to protect products.
    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday September 23 2015, @07:09PM

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 23 2015, @07:09PM (#240655) Journal

    That's a valid point, but it doesn't invalidate the point I was making. Patents often are not explicit. They are intentionally written to be a vague as can be gotten away with partially so that the claims can be as wide as possible. It's not clear that the intention is really to prevent others from being able to copy the work ... most of the time. As you point out, that is more properly addressed by a trade secret. But since they want to be as vague as possible anyway, the holders certainly don't hesitate to take the additional advantage of making replication unfeasible. This is not supposed to be allowed, but that requirement is rarely enforced, and then only in egregious cases.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.