Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Sunday October 04 2015, @11:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the lighten-up-man dept.

AlterNet reports

This week it was announced that Oregon will be expunging the old records of marijuana offenders, along with their new legalization plan. This measure is the farthest that a state has gone to date in regards to applying the new laws to old cases. However, for people who remain in jail for having a plant, the legalization plan does not go far enough.

According to the New York Times (paywall), people who have low-level felony or misdemeanor marijuana charges on their record that are at least ten years old will be eligible for expungement.

While the transition in Oregon is nowhere near what is needed for the hundreds of thousands who are still incarcerated, the aspect that allows for old cases to be expunged is at least a step in the right direction, and is helping people clear their records so they can avoid discrimination.

"Oregon is one of the first states to really grapple with the issue of what do you do with a record of something that used to be a crime and no longer is", law professor Jenny M. Roberts told the New York Times.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 05 2015, @12:29AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 05 2015, @12:29AM (#245414)

    I didn't give credence that employers on the west coast cared about weed any more. Amazing.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 05 2015, @12:41AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 05 2015, @12:41AM (#245421)

    Some might, and the doctors that do drug testing will drop you if there's anything in your system that isn't prescribed.

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Francis on Monday October 05 2015, @03:11AM

    by Francis (5544) on Monday October 05 2015, @03:11AM (#245458)

    There's plenty of employers that care about that as well as tobacco use. Not to mention anybody requires a clean drug test for licensing reasons. Even legal medications can land you in hot water at times.

    When I was younger, I objected to the drug testing, but as I've grown older, I've gotten tired of picking up the slack for people that choose to use drugs. I'd much prefer to work in a drug-free workplace than to put up with the consequences of other people disrespecting their bodies like that.

    • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by aristarchus on Monday October 05 2015, @05:29AM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Monday October 05 2015, @05:29AM (#245491) Journal

      When I was younger, I objected to the drug testing, but as I've grown older, I've gotten -tired of picking up the slack for people that choose to use drugs- prescriptions for more of the drugs I use.

      Dude, FTFY! Toke on, Dude!

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Monday October 05 2015, @01:02PM

      by sjames (2882) on Monday October 05 2015, @01:02PM (#245592) Journal

      Personally, I still object to drug testing. I don't care what people do in their off hours. I *DO* object to people being high on the job.

    • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Monday October 05 2015, @06:12PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Monday October 05 2015, @06:12PM (#245746) Journal

      ...put up with the consequences of other people disrespecting their bodies like that.

      Yeah, that weed hangover will really screw up your work day.