Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday July 30 2016, @12:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the perhaps-they-should-have-asked-Cortana dept.

The job cuts were revealed in paperwork filed on Thursday with US financial watchdog the SEC. The doomed staff will leave the business by the end of next June. They all work in Microsoft's sales teams and its Windows Phone hardware division. [...] We understand 900 people in the global sales unit have already learned of their fate.

As for the latest redundancies, here's the relevant sections of Microsoft's annual 10-K report to the SEC:

In addition to the elimination of 1,850 positions that were announced in May 2016, approximately 2,850 roles globally will be reduced during the year as an extension of the earlier plan, and these actions are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2017.

As of June 30, 2016, we employed approximately 114,000 people on a full-time basis, 63,000 in the U.S. and 51,000 internationally. Of the total employed people, 38,000 were in operations, including manufacturing, distribution, product support, and consulting services; 37,000 in product research and development; 29,000 in sales and marketing; and 10,000 in general and administration.

While the layoffs affect just 2.5 per cent of Microsoft's workforce, they are very precise and telling cuts: Windows-powered mobiles managed to seize just three per cent of the global smartphone market, and now Redmond is dismantling that failed operation.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GungnirSniper on Saturday July 30 2016, @02:49AM

    by GungnirSniper (1671) on Saturday July 30 2016, @02:49AM (#381860) Journal

    Windows CE had a decade head start and is now circling the BlackBerry drain as Windows whatever.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Francis on Saturday July 30 2016, @03:56AM

    by Francis (5544) on Saturday July 30 2016, @03:56AM (#381872)

    To be fair, MS doesn't know how to enter a market if somebody else doesn't get it to the verge of mainstream acceptance.

  • (Score: 1) by anubi on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:24AM

    by anubi (2828) on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:24AM (#381894) Journal

    Windows CE...

    Gee, I had just bought a HMI on one of Saelig's clearance sales, hoping to use it with my Arduino-compatibles as part of a SCADA system for my van.

    When I powered the thing up, first thing it does is give me the Microsoft logo. Windows CE.

    Sure, I know I can replace the startup flash screen, but the first thing that comes to mind is what do I do if the thing suddenly starts demanding I connect it to the net to download a new OS? Can I really trust this thing if I am embedding it into something else? Will it work even 10 years from now ( the van is already over 20 years old, and I expect it to last me another 20. No kidding. I got 40 years from my Toyota Corolla, and its nowhere near as rugged as this old Ford E-350 ).

    The Toyota still runs fine... Everything in it is worn out though, and my needs have changed since I got it. When I got it - I needed inexpensive transportation to get me to and from work, which it did every day for over 40 years. Being I am no longer corporately employed, I now need something that will haul me - and my stuff - as I have my own tools and equipment now, and if someone engages me to do something for them, I will usually have everything I need to do it in the van.

    My previous experiences with Microsoft is constantly having to patch it and trust third parties to fix its security holes, as well as that constant lingering threat that if I do not obey, something is going to time out and I will be left with a brick because something else must authorize it to run.

    Well, I'll keep the thing for some corporate-type show&tell, as I know the corporate types are impressed by stuff like this... but I had to re-order the HMI panel that I am programming for my van. I am hoping the "DELTA" I am getting does not have the Microsoft in it. When I put that much of my personal time into building something, I have all intentions of doing it once, doing it right, and having it work until I decommission it.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by NCommander on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:26AM

    by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:26AM (#381895) Homepage Journal

    The problem with Windows CE was it was a palmtop OS shoehorned onto a phone. I owned several CE devices, and for a long time, they were the most powerful and versatile portable devices I had. With CE, I could easily go into the filesystem, and change out system components if I wanted. It was basically Windows 95* with a different UI. In comparison, PalmOS was extremely simplistic and limited, and neither S60 nor Prism had much marketshare in the US. Installing apps generally involved running an installer or copying EXEs like Windows.

    What killed CE was basically the fact that it was never a polished system; it suffered from the "jack of all trades, master of none" problem, and it made a pretty losey phone. Palm's Treo line was basically the same thing, decent PDA, horrible phone. Same was true of BlackBerry. That taint more or less carried onto Windows Phone 7 (which isn't bad, my mom is a fairly dedicated Windows phone user, she's had several, and even a Windows RT tablet).

    What made iOS and Android break out in 2007 was they were legitimately good phones with the ability to do more. Even then, unless you have a rooted Android device, what you can do with said devices feels far more limited than what I was doing in 2000 with a Windows CE device, and embedded Visual C++.

    --
    Still always moving
    • (Score: 2) by NCommander on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:30AM

      by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Saturday July 30 2016, @06:30AM (#381898) Homepage Journal

      The * got deleted by accident. To prevent nitpicking, I'm aware that 95 and CE have no commonalty between the two of them beside a name. NT was very much limited to businesses at the time, so at the high point of Microsoft's mobile domination, the comparsion was basically between CE and 95/98.

      Honestly, I'd love to see a modern replacement for the HP Jornada. I used to use a Palm VIIx with the Palm Keyboard as a mobile work platform, and its hard to find anything that comes close to that. Using Android with a BT keyboard is an extremely sucky experience in comparison.

      --
      Still always moving
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by pvanhoof on Saturday July 30 2016, @11:13AM

      by pvanhoof (4638) on Saturday July 30 2016, @11:13AM (#381930) Homepage

      Having developed on WinCE I can tell you it's not Win95 with a new UI. It's much more like MS Dos + Win 3.11. For example is CreateFileMapping (that's mmap, on real operating systems) implemented by simply copying the file in memory for each process again. That means that it doesn't do what you expect it do to when using DLL files: every process will trigger the entire DLL to be copied into RAM.

      How I know this? Well. Our application was Qt4 based. The Qt4 DLLs are relatively big. Although the binaries where not statically linked, every process was getting the entire copy of the Qt DLLs in real memory. Actually, every thread was. Not just every process.

      So really, WinCE is not a good OS at all. Unless you want MS Dos with a little bit of UI.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by NCommander on Saturday July 30 2016, @11:32PM

        by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Saturday July 30 2016, @11:32PM (#382099) Homepage Journal

        I'm aware CE internally under the hood has little in common. Programming for it wasn't a whole lot of fun either with everything having to use unicode everything, and some of the internal APIs being down right strange (DLL behavior you menthoned is one of them), though it was better than coding for PalmOS's which was much more constrained and painful. I used prc-tools for that, but I never heard anything good said about the official Metroworks environment. I never coded for Symbian, but I've heard people still curse that to this day.

        What I was getting fact was in terms of user experience, CE was the best at a portable computer environment especially once you added a keyboard. Where it fell through was it was a rather miserable phone experience, combined with the fact that cell vendors usually tended to pour on so much crap on low specs as to make it an unresponsive POS.

        --
        Still always moving