Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by on Wednesday April 19 2017, @10:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the another-day-another-populist-strongman dept.

Turkish President May Receive Increased Power

The Associated Press via CBC reports on preliminary results of a referendum held in Turkey on whether the powers of the president should be increased:

With 99 per cent of the ballots counted, the "yes" vote stood at 51.37 per cent, while the "no" vote was 48.63 per cent, according to the state-run Anadolu Agency. The head of Turkey's electoral board confirmed the "yes" victory and said final results will be declared in 11-12 days.

BBC News quotes the leader of an opposing party:

The main opposition, the Republican People's Party (CHP), has called for a recount.

Deputy leader Bulent Tezcan denounced "violations" in the electoral process. "We will pursue a legal battle. If the irregularities are not fixed, there will be a serious legitimacy discussion," he said.

additional coverage:

Turkish Electorate Appears to Choose Dictatorship; Opposition Cries Foul

Common Dreams reports Erdoğan Claims Ultimate Power in Turkey After Nearly Split Vote.

As one opponent of the referendum noted: "Threats, oppression, imprisonment, censorship, defamation--and yet half of the people of Turkey voted" against.

In a very close--and closely watched--referendum vote, Turks on [April 16] handed President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan what many say is authoritarian rule.

With more than 99 percent of ballots counted, Erdoğan claimed a win with 51.36 percent voting in favor of the referendum and 48.64 voting against.

However, the Guardian reported,

disparities persisted into Sunday evening, with the opposition saying not all ballots had been counted and they would contest a third of the votes that had been cast. [Sadi Guven, the head of Turkey's high electoral board, or YSK] said the YSK had decided to consider unstamped ballots as valid unless they were proved to be fraudulent after a high number of complaints--including one from the ruling AK Party--that its officials had failed to stamp some ballot papers.

The No campaign said the YSK's last-minute decision raised questions about the validity of the vote.

TheFederalistPapers.org reports Turkey Votes To Turn Itself Into An Islamic Dictatorship.

Turkey's new dictator, President Recip Tayyip Erdoğan claimed victory in Sunday's vote on whether he should essentially take almost complete control over the country.

The opposition has said they would contest the election, citing rampant voter fraud, but the election is no less stunning.

Turkey is a member of NATO and a crucial ally (sometimes) in the fight against terrorism.

[...] If the results are upheld, it gives Turkey's government--with Erdoğan at the helm--widespread authority to scrap the centuries-old parliamentary system, replacing it with a presidential model. It would concentrate massive power in the hands of the president who has recently jailed opponents and cracked down on dissent.

Erdoğan will be able to appoint senior judges, declare a state of emergency, dissolve parliament, and in some cases issue new laws be [decreed].

It will also theoretically allow Erdoğan, who has dominated Turkish politics as president and prime minister since 2003, to stay in office until 2029.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by bradley13 on Wednesday April 19 2017, @10:45AM (7 children)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @10:45AM (#496233) Homepage Journal

    What happens to the turks tho is well their problem.

    In a sense, true. However, you don't really believe that the majority of the population wants this, do you? I mean, aside from the people in jail, the people threatened with jail (or, in the case of the Kurds, with military reprisals), the people intimidated into not voting. Aside from all of that, I'm quite sure that Erdogan would have ensured the vote went his way regardless, after all, vote-counters have families too...

    So, sure, it's the Turks problem. But it's a problem for the rest of Europe as well, because we have to live next door to this.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by looorg on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:18AM (5 children)

    by looorg (578) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:18AM (#496237)

    Do I believe there was some kind of election fraud? Highly probable. With that in mind you could also then conclude that the remaining population that gets to vote have been stacked in favor of Erdogan, a lot of it might come from the purge after the latest failed coup. The Kurds are 15ish % of the population and they have always been put down. The central government probably has a big hard on for keeping them down and are massively afraid of a complete Syrian collapse where the Kurds can then carve out a working "homeland" across Northern Iraq (which seems to already be a reality) and parts of Syria (almost there). If that thing gets traction the only remain part would be a fair chunk of south-eastern Turkey. They clearly want to avoid that at almost any cost.

    As far as Europe goes the problem has imo been that we have been to soft on Turkey and Erdogan. Stringing them along instead of telling them off. If "Fortress Europe" was a real thing we wouldn't have to worry about Turkey. Now we are trying to bribe them to keep all the refugees. We should build a big fucking wall (quite possibly not an actual wall), everyone that comes across into Greece, Italy or anywhere in Eastern Europe should be pushed back out of Europe and then we could just tell Erdogan to go fuck himself. Sucks for the refugees but then we can't be the only safe spot available to them, we are full.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:33AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:33AM (#496245)

      Can do, Won't do. Seems a lot of politicians these days have other alliances than their own people. So while it's no problem to solve really. It will not be done.

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday April 19 2017, @03:50PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @03:50PM (#496371)

      I'm surprised the vote was as close as it was.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Wednesday April 19 2017, @06:03PM (1 child)

      by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @06:03PM (#496452) Journal

      Do I believe there was some kind of election fraud? Highly probable.

      Yes, but regardless of the extent of possible fraud in this case, I think we're beginning to see the end of democracy worldwide, or at least widespread recognition of its failure. For every dictator who is fraudulently elected, there is another example of a tyrant who is voted in voluntarily by the public.

      Of course Plato recognized this back in the days when democracy was a new idea. If people don't know this already, they really should acquaint themselves with Plato's five political systems [wikipedia.org]. You may not agree with his outlook or preference for "philosopher kings," but history has clearly proven him right again and again as democracy turns into "mob rule" and that mob eventually votes in favor of tyranny.

      This has happened again and again throughout history, which is why the Founders of the U.S. took such great pains to take power away from the people and direct democracy. But in the past century or so, populism has led to the rallying cry of "democracy" as a force for good in the world, which means more "power to the people."

      Ironically, though, history has shown us that "the people," having been granted power, frequently vote it away to a dictator who promises them stuff they want (food, safety, homes, land, jobs, etc.). The educated people of the 18th century had read their history and understood this. Of course, there's no perfect system -- putting power out of the hands of the people risks corruption at other levels of government.

      In recent years, it has been common to slam other "bad" countries for having "bad democracies," i.e., even if they are nominally democratic, their system isn't functional. But given recent events in many countries, I think it's worthwhile considering whether that strict distinction between "good" and "bad" democracies is really sustainable. Plato warned us that democracies can easily degrade into tyranny. At some point we seem to have forgotten that lesson -- or perhaps thought, "Oh, no -- that couldn't happen in a modern democracy! We have the RIGHT kind of government! It can't happen here!"

      Folks, it's happening. Around the world. Even classic "good" western democracies are increasingly voting in favor of people who promise them totalitarian regimes. France could be the next to take a big step away from freedom in favor of vacuous populist rhetoric. The dominos may be starting to tumble, and most people don't even notice. All we worry about are rare "terrorist" events (most of them committed by mentally ill people with no strong ties to actual organizations) and people who don't look like us. We chase people who promise us jobs and houses and good lives, but who really have their own agendas that ultimately work against the people in the long run.

      Maybe it was always thus. But I have to admit that for the first time in my life, I'm getting worried about the very future of democracy.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 20 2017, @01:04AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 20 2017, @01:04AM (#496628)

        A lot of democracies are already corrupted such that they proceed with actions that are not in the interest of the people. The reaction is of course to vote into the far end of the political spectrum in order to make sure there's a course change even if it has bad side effects.

        There seems to be a lot of mentally ill people with good coordination skills. What is more interesting is the lack of action of the government both in removing these people from the society and from letting more in.

        When the people vote power goes wrong another vote btw is the one of using ones feet.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:02PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @11:02PM (#496597)

      Subsequent headlines:

      "Massive Electoral Fraud" in Turkey's Referendum [alternet.org]

      Dark Cloud of Illegitimacy Hovers Over Turkey Vote [bipartisanpolicy.org]

      ...and, as for Iran being the boilerplate for crooked election, folks might want to check out what happened in Georgia's special election yesterday to replace the congressman who was appointed CIA Director.

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @03:12PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @03:12PM (#496341)

    I would assume that we can be fairly certain that the door to any kind of EU membership is firmly shut

    It's Turkey's Brexit. Even the margin is the same.