Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Politics
posted by chromas on Tuesday July 10 2018, @12:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the hangerctl dept.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh named Trump's second Supreme Court justice - live updates

President Trump announced his selection of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to be his second Supreme Court justice Monday night. Speaking in the East Room of the White House, the president said that what mattered to him was "not a judge's political views, but whether they can set aside those views to do what the law and the Constitution require."

"I am pleased to say that I have found, without a doubt, such a person," he said in announcing Kavanaugh's nomination. "There is no one in America more qualified for this position and no one more deserving," the president also said. The D.C. Circuit Appeals Court judge "has impeccable credentials, unsurpassed qualifications, and aproven commitment to equal justice under the law," the president continued. He's "a judge's judge, a true thought leader among his peers. He's a brilliant jurist with a clear and effective writing style, universally regarded as one of the finest and sharpest legal minds of our time."

Kavanaugh thanked the president for the nomination, and in anticipating his coming meetings with senators on Capitol hill tomorrow, said, "I believe that an independent judiciary is the crown jewel of our constitutional republic." He promised, "If confirmed by the Senate, I will keep an open mind in every case and I will always strive to preserve the Constitution of the United States and the American rule of law."

Within a few days of Justice Anthony Kennedy's announcement that he would retire from the court this summer, Mr. Trump had narrowed the field to four: Judges Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Thomas Hardiman and Raymond Kethledge -- all young and all viewed as conservative. Ultimately, the president settled on Kavanaugh, the establishment favorite.

On the issue everyone wants to know about:

Kavanaugh has stated that he considers Roe v. Wade binding under the principle of stare decisis and would seek to uphold it, but has also ruled in favor of some restrictions for abortion.

In May 2006, Kavanaugh stated he "would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully" and that the issue of the legality of abortion has already "been decided by the Supreme Court". During the hearing, he stated that a right to an abortion has been found "many times", citing Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

In October 2017, Kavanaugh joined an unsigned divided panel opinion which found that the Office of Refugee Resettlement could prevent an unaccompanied minor in its custody from obtaining an abortion. Days later, the en banc D.C. Circuit reversed that judgment, with Kavanaugh now dissenting. The D.C. Circuit's opinion was then itself vacated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Garza v. Hargan (2018).

See also:

Previously: SCOTUS's Justice Anthony Kennedy to Retire


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Entropy on Tuesday July 10 2018, @01:29PM (2 children)

    by Entropy (4228) on Tuesday July 10 2018, @01:29PM (#705051)

    To be fair.. he's not a politician. His job isn't to speak in public, or lie about everything.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 10 2018, @01:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 10 2018, @01:51PM (#705066)

    In his speech, he talks about his mother being in the legal profession, his father loving sports, his mother's advice to follow one's gut, and his pride in having hired mostly women to be his clerks. It's a monstrously stupid, emotional, and base political speech, which was delivered in a childish manner and which diminishes this person's credibility as being worthy of crafting pronouncements from the Supreme Court.

  • (Score: 2) by fritsd on Tuesday July 10 2018, @03:42PM

    by fritsd (4586) on Tuesday July 10 2018, @03:42PM (#705159) Journal

    Actually, I disagree, because I always thought that a judge had to be very careful with his/her words, on the record, in the courtroom. A certain amount of decorum is expected: "here speaketh the Law! You're sentenced to life in prison! No wait, strike that from the record, that's the next crim. 16 hours community service!".

    I know that's not like speaking in public, or lying about everything. But I'd imagine when a judge has to make a public speech it would be very short and about judges etc.

    I don't actually know any judges (can you tell?)