SoylentNews

fork(2) [soylentnews.org] writes:

        Emma Pelton, a biologist with the Xerces Society, said [mercurynews.com], "Most children can identify one bug, and it's monarch butterflies." The majestic, six-legged butterflies, are generally grouped into two populations, eastern and western. Most who have ever seen it will agree that the migration of the eastern monarch [wikipedia.org] population is one of the most awesome spectacles in nature as millions of butterflies travel thousands of miles to overwinter in Mexico.

      A new study, which appears in the online journal Animal Migration [degruyter.com] strongly suggests that the wing structure of the migrating butterflies is strongly influenced by the migration itself.

      From ScienceDaily [sciencedaily.com]:

The new study builds on a certain previous analysis that had shown migratory populations of monarchs tend to have larger wings than non-migratory populations, suggesting that migration acts to keep monarchs large. However, in that study the butterflies that had the smallest wings tended to be closer to Earth's equator. This left open the possibility that the populations differed because of Bergmann's rule, which is a general principle throughout the animal kingdom whereby animals living closer to the equator (with warmer climate) tend to be smaller than those living in colder locations away from the equator. To sort out which of these two possibilities is the cause of the wing variation, a group of researchers from Emory University in Atlanta, GA examined a larger collection of monarchs from around the globe and compared wing features of each population, migratory and non-migratory. They also looked for evidence that the wings corresponded to the latitude of the population, which would support Bergmann's rule.

      In the end the researchers found no evidence that the wing differences followed Bergmann's rule, and instead they concluded that the main driver of the population differences was indeed the migration, as was found in the earlier work. It seems that the long-distance journey acts to weed out smaller monarchs each year, leaving only the biggest ones, which then go on to reproduce. In monarch populations that are sedentary, this selection does not happen.

Original Submission