Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Saturday April 19 2014, @04:13AM   Printer-friendly

The NY Times reports

Scientists have moved a step closer to the goal of creating stem cells perfectly matched to a patient's DNA in order to treat diseases, they announced on Thursday, creating patient-specific cell lines out of the skin cells of two adult men.

The LA Times reports

The work, reported Thursday in the journal Cell Stem Cell, comes 11 months after researchers in Oregon said they had produced the world's first human embryo clones and used them to make stem cells. Their study, published in Cell, aroused skepticism after critics pointed out multiple errors and duplicated images.

Stem cells advances have been dogged by allegations of fraud and irreproducibility.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Kell on Saturday April 19 2014, @06:07AM

    by Kell (292) on Saturday April 19 2014, @06:07AM (#33290)

    "Stem cells advances have been dogged by allegations of fraud and irreproducibility."

    But that's not these researchers and not this company. This is useless inflammatory editorial muckraking.

    --
    Scientists ask questions. Engineers solve problems.
    • (Score: 2) by n1 on Saturday April 19 2014, @03:50PM

      by n1 (993) on Saturday April 19 2014, @03:50PM (#33369) Journal

      I can understand your opinion and those who modded you up.

      However, the last sentence was from the submitter. I didn't remove it because stem cells are controversial and link were provided. In no way was it implied these researchers or company have been implicated in fraud. Previous advances in the field have been unreliable, I don't think it's unreasonable to include that here, especially when TFA notes skepticism over the results from the researchers previous study.

    • (Score: 1) by takyon on Saturday April 19 2014, @04:59PM

      by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Saturday April 19 2014, @04:59PM (#33387) Journal
      Why did I write that line? Simple. Because it's true... and it was big in the news this very week. You'll see that the LA Times article talks about it. Good to mention it so that you get the background and understand some of the skepticism. Though judging by the lack of comments here, nobody cares.

      What I didn't do was attempt an explanation of iPSCs vs. embryonic stem cells.
      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Saturday April 19 2014, @06:48PM

        by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 19 2014, @06:48PM (#33410) Journal

        It's not so much that I don't care, as that I don't have the knowledge to judge how plausible this is. Or how effective. Or how long it will take to become standard practice. Or... well, you get the idea.

        If I hear about a new transistor being developed in a lab I know it will take around a decade to show up on my desktop, if it proves out. I don't have that kind of knowledge about stem cell developments. (Given government regulations, and the attendant change with each new manager, I'd guess that nobody does.)

        --
        Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.