Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday April 14 2021, @04:47PM   Printer-friendly [Skip to comment(s)]

Charter must pay $19 million for tricking customers into switching ISPs:

A judge has ordered Charter Communications to pay $19.2 million to Windstream for lying to customers in order to trick them into switching from Windstream to Charter's Spectrum Internet service. Charter also faces a $5,279 penalty for shutting off service to hundreds of Windstream's resale customers.

When Windstream filed for bankruptcy in early 2019, Charter began a "literally false and intentionally misleading advertising campaign intended to create the impression, using mailings designed to seem as if they were coming from the Debtors [Windstream], that the Debtors were going out of business," said an order issued Thursday by Judge Robert Drain of US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

Charter's goal with the mailings "was to induce the Debtors' customers to terminate their contracts and switch to Charter by sending them literally false and intentionally misleading information about the Debtors' bankruptcy cases and financial wherewithal," the ruling said. Charter premised its ad campaign "on false assertions regarding the Debtors' bankruptcy cases," the ruling said.

"We are gratified that Judge Drain's ruling means Charter will have to pay a significant price for its egregious false advertising," Windstream General Counsel Kristi Moody said, according to a FierceTelecom article. "Charter knew full well what it was doing when it embarked on a dishonest scare-tactic campaign to lure away our customers. At Windstream, we will always aggressively defend ourselves and our customers against predatory schemes and meritless allegations."

Charter declined to comment on the ruling when contacted by Ars today.

As mentioned in a related Gizmodo article:

Ironically, Charter had filed a lawsuit against DirecTV in 2009 for giving its customers a false impression they would lose their service because of Charter's bankruptcy filing.


Original Submission

Related Stories

Charter Charges More Money for Slower Internet on Streets With No Competition 59 comments

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/05/charter-charges-more-money-for-slower-internet-on-streets-with-no-competition/

It's no surprise that cable companies charge lower prices for broadband when they face competition from fiber-to-the-home services. But an article yesterday by Stop the Cap provides a good example of how dramatically promotional prices for Charter's Spectrum Internet service can vary from one street to the next.

In this example, Charter charges $20 more per month for slower speeds on the street where it faces no serious competition. When customers in two areas purchase the same speeds, the customer on the street without competition could have to pay $40 more per month and would have their promotional rates expire after only one year instead of two.

Stop the Cap said it examined promotional offers to new customers in the metro Rochester, New York, market, "where Spectrum faces token competition from Frontier's slow speed DSL service" and more robust competition in limited areas from Greenlight Networks' fiber service. Greenlight fiber is available in 23 percent of Rochester, while Charter cable is available to homes throughout the city, according to BroadbandNow. Greenlight prices start at $50 per month for 500Mbps.

"Charter's offers are address-sensitive," Stop the Cap founder Phillip Dampier wrote. "The cable company knows its competition and almost exactly where those competitors offer service. That is why the company asks for your service address before it quotes you pricing."

Am I the only one that's appalled at the Upload speeds? From the linked BroadbandNow page for Spectrum: Speeds up to:1,000 Mbps Download, 35 Mbps Upload

Previously:
Charter Must Pay $19 Million for Tricking Customers Into Switching ISPs


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @12:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @12:12AM (#1137412)

    Ermagerd

  • (Score: 2) by shortscreen on Friday May 21 2021, @12:25AM (1 child)

    by shortscreen (2252) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 21 2021, @12:25AM (#1137414) Journal

    While the editors are working on getting us all back to our own timeline, let's take care not to talk about the future lest someone on the past internet sees it and history is changed irrevocably.

    I mean... greetings, internet goers! It's April 14th, and what a nice day it is! How about that Darwin's Arch? Still standing strong as ever, eh?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @01:48AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @01:48AM (#1137456)

      You don't think we should warn then about muskybro?

  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @12:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 21 2021, @12:27AM (#1137415)

    * He getting that sweet sweet sugar all up the butt.

    [00:06:02] i pray to gods every day that donnie t. has a stroke, a revelation, and starts a crusade against taboo words
    [00:06:35] you make it taboo and I promise to use it frequently
    [00:07:28] what part of his brain do you think could be damaged by a stroke?
    [00:07:43] yeah Runaway1956 you are like a foot-scout for the wing of his army that will make offensive against n-word
    [00:08:05] By "n-word", I presume that you mean "nigger"?
    [00:08:26] that's the one
    [00:08:46] But, you won't man up and designate the word properly?
    [00:11:27] i work for the state of california, where no one gives two shits about free speech when it comes to group slurs, so yeah, i am piling up into my breeches every time i even talk �about� it
    [00:11:57] So? You work for Commifornia?
    [00:12:56] yeah, don't expect me to "man up" on this issue
    [00:13:30] Well, I'll just follow Sleepy Joe's example - he's the proper leader of our country and all that nonsense
    [00:13:39] also, "n-word" is as perfect of a designator as it gets,quite unambiguous
    [00:14:04] "n-word" is candy ass, but yeah, I always know what the candy asses mean.

    * names changed to protect involved parties

(1)