Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Tuesday October 05 2021, @11:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the was-it-named-"James"? dept.

Researchers measure the breakup of a single chemical bond:

Using advanced microscopy techniques at Princeton University, researchers have recorded the breaking of a single chemical bond between a carbon atom and an iron atom on different molecules.

The team used a high-resolution atomic force microscope (AFM) operating in a controlled environment at Princeton's Imaging and Analysis Center. The AFM probe, whose tip ends in a single copper atom, was moved gradually closer to the iron-carbon bond until it was ruptured. The researchers measured the mechanical forces applied at the moment of breakage, which was visible in an image captured by the microscope. A team from Princeton University, the University of Texas-Austin and ExxonMobil reported the results in a paper published Sept. 24 in Nature Communications.

"It's an incredible image — being able to actually see a single small molecule on a surface with another one bonded to it is amazing," said coauthor Craig Arnold, the Susan Dod Brown Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and director of the Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials (PRISM).

"The fact that we could characterize that particular bond, both by pulling on it and pushing on it, allows us to understand a lot more about the nature of these kinds of bonds — their strength, how they interact — and this has all sorts of implications, particularly for catalysis, where you have a molecule on a surface and then something interacts with it and causes it to break apart," said Arnold.

Nan Yao, a principal investigator of the study and the director of Princeton's Imaging and Analysis Center, noted that the experiments also revealed insights into how bond breaking affects a catalyst's interactions with the surface on which it's adsorbed. Improving the design of chemical catalysts has relevance for biochemistry, materials science and energy technologies, added Yao, who is also a professor of the practice and senior research scholar in PRISM.

Journal Reference:
Nan Yao, Pengcheng Chen, Dingxin Fan, Nem, et al. The Chemical Structure of a Molecule Resolved by Atomic Force Microscopy, Science (DOI: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1176210)

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @11:53AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @11:53AM (#1184420)

    It's not you . . . it's me. I've just got a lot of stuff going on now, but we can still be friends.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @02:32PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @02:32PM (#1184457)

      You could even say that our bond was like steel...

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday October 05 2021, @03:59PM

      by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday October 05 2021, @03:59PM (#1184478) Journal
      Paywalled? Sigh. Here are the slides:
      .
      o
      O
      8
      o o
      O O
      8 8
      --
      🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by FatPhil on Tuesday October 05 2021, @04:53PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Tuesday October 05 2021, @04:53PM (#1184488) Homepage
    The "photo" from the article is very impressive. That family of molecules has been a favourite for STM and AFM right since the beginning, as it has a nice flat structure and symmetry, and resolution-wise these images are just progressive improvements over the prior ones ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Phthalocyanine_STM.jpg ), the novelty here is deliberately interacting with the molecule to change it as you're imaging it. But where can we go to from here, is this the limit. We're not even "seeing" these atoms, we're "feeling" them, and we're not even feeling any thing in itself (the noumenon in philosophy of science terms) we're just feeling their effects (the phenomenon). Light is too chunky to resolve these distances, and bombarding molecules with sufficiently higher energies will break them (OK, X-ray crystalography's a thing, it can image bulk properties). However, light has shown us more detail of electron orbital shapes, http://www.quantumphysicslady.org/what-does-an-electron-orbital-look-like/ , but that's in some ways cheating, it's a statistical reconstruction from a whole bunch of scattering experiments. But "stacking" is valid in astronomy to turn many low quality images into a higher quality one, so there's no reason stacking electron detections is somehow an invalid way of "seeing" the probability distributions for electron orbitals.

    But what's next? Is there anything else that's even theoretically doable that's a quantum step inwards from these kinds of things. At some point it has to stop, surely? And are we there already, will it all just be minor refinement of the same things from now on?
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @05:50PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @05:50PM (#1184502)

    Showing in theaters now, ~No Time to Die~
    clearly shows the breakup of a single Bond.

    • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Tuesday October 05 2021, @06:20PM (1 child)

      by MostCynical (2589) on Tuesday October 05 2021, @06:20PM (#1184514) Journal

      plot was thin.
      characters did not grow
      expect re-release in months

      --
      "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @10:55PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 05 2021, @10:55PM (#1184570)

        Agree...too many Chemical Agents.

(1)