Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Thursday October 24, @07:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the Qualcomm-Inside dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

As Intel struggles with a falling stock price and revenue failing to meet expectations, there were reports last month that Qualcomm had approached Chipzilla with an acquisition offer.

According to people familiar with the matter who spoke to Bloomberg, Qualcomm has decided to wait until after the election before deciding its next move. Such a massive deal would undoubtedly face intense scrutiny from regulators, both domestic and globally. The company wants to see how the next administration's policies affect factors that could impact the acquisition, such as antitrust rules and US-China relations.

China is an important market for both Qualcomm and Intel. In the same month that it first approached Intel, Qualcomm met with antitrust regulators in China to gauge any potential response to the deal. The company hasn't received any feedback from Chinese authorities, who are apparently waiting to see if Qualcomm makes a formal offer for Intel.

In the US, where Intel is the key player in the government's plan to reignite the country's domestic chip manufacturing industry, White House support for the deal would be crucial.

Intel is set to become the biggest beneficiary of the Chips act, receiving $8.5 billion in grants as well as $11 billion in low-interest loans, provided it proceeds with its factory construction plans. It's been six months since the government announced the award and Intel is still waiting for the funding. Qualcomm has been in discussions with US regulators and believes that an all-American merger could alleviate any concerns, according to the report.


Original Submission

This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2, Troll) by driverless on Thursday October 24, @09:56AM (2 children)

    by driverless (4770) on Thursday October 24, @09:56AM (#1378443)

    Intel is set to become the biggest beneficiary of the Chips act, receiving $8.5 billion in grants as well as $11 billion in low-interest loans, provided it proceeds with its factory construction plans.

    So when China does it it's evil and reprehensible and bad, when the US does it it's OK?

    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Freeman on Thursday October 24, @02:09PM (1 child)

      by Freeman (732) on Thursday October 24, @02:09PM (#1378454) Journal

      China thinks it's bad when the US does it. Also, the US thinks it's bad when China does it. There's a lot more relationships to consider when you add in other countries to the equation. Though, generally I would assume, *not my country* is spying on *my country* and that is bad. We're not all on the same team.

      --
      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
      • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Thursday October 24, @02:12PM

        by Freeman (732) on Thursday October 24, @02:12PM (#1378455) Journal

        Sorry for my lack of coffee and/or enough coffee. My brain went off in a totally different tangent.

        The problem is when a country massively subsidizes a company to stifle competition in any / all other countries.

        --
        Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(1)