Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Monday February 22 2016, @01:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the we-only-want-'good'-news dept.

As reported by The Guardian:

Many British politicians would doubtless rejoice at the news that Andrew Marr, Emily Maitlis, and Andrew Neil were to leave their jobs almost simultaneously.

That is the fate that has befallen what could loosely be described as their counterparts in Japan – Ichiro Furutachi, Hiroko Kuniya and Shigetada Kishii – three respected broadcasters with a reputation for asking tough questions.

Their imminent departure from evening news programmes is not just a loss to their profession; critics say they were forced out as part of a crackdown on media dissent by an increasingly intolerant prime minister, Shinzo Abe, and his supporters.

Only last week, the internal affairs minister, Sanae Takaichi, sent a clear message to media organisations. Broadcasters that repeatedly failed to show "fairness" in their political coverage, despite official warnings, could be taken off the air, she told MPs.

Under broadcast laws, the internal affairs minister has the power to suspend broadcasting that does not maintain political neutrality.

Additional coverage at LibertyBlitzkrieg.com.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday February 23 2016, @01:38AM

    by frojack (1554) on Tuesday February 23 2016, @01:38AM (#308453) Journal

    I would have thought my comment made it crystal clear that a government solution wasn't wanted.

    However, you assume there is no leverage. Yet we LICENSE TV stations, and we lease public broadcast spectrum (for large sums of money) to TV stations with the expectation that they will adhere to some standards and regulations.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Tuesday February 23 2016, @03:21AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Tuesday February 23 2016, @03:21AM (#308487)

    However, you assume there is no leverage. Yet we LICENSE TV stations, and we lease public broadcast spectrum (for large sums of money) to TV stations with the expectation that they will adhere to some standards and regulations.

    I don't assume that. I'm well aware that the government violates the constitution.