Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday July 23 2016, @08:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the camera+GPS=knowing-most-everything dept.

This data-mining game is what they call totalitarianism is how Oliver Stone described Pokémon Go at Comic Con. Earlier in the month Al Franken also expressed some concern asking the creator of the game about privacy, data sharing, and account access.

More from Stone:

They're data-mining every person in this room for information as to what you're buying, what you like, and above all, your behaviour. Pokémon Go kicks into that. But this is everywhere. It's what some people call surveillance capitalism. It's the newest stage. It's not for profit in the beginning, but it becomes for profit in the end.

It manipulates your behaviour. It has happened already quite a bit on the Internet, but you'll see it everywhere—you'll see a new form of, frankly, a robot society, where they will know how you want to behave and they will make the mockup that matches how you behave and feed you. It's what they call totalitarianism.

Personally I gave up my smart phone more than two years ago because I did not want a spy machine in my pocket; I've never played Pokémon Go but it seemed like a great way for the game creators to get people to run around and point the players camera at what ever they want, obtain other location based data, or focus players into businesses that pay for the privilege. Perhaps I just need to adjust my tinfoil hat but what do the 'lentils think? Is Stone just trying to plug his new movie or is this a legitimate concern?

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 23 2016, @10:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 23 2016, @10:05PM (#379180)

    > None of them reported about the offensive, racist comments SHE HERSELF had made before.

    Because they weren't. I saw the gif of screen caps floating around that were intended to be oh so damning. They were weak tea and none of them were attacks on anyone.

    But see the original point about Milo's angry, conspiracy theory loving herd.

    > Don't believe me? Then why did the entire MSM all use the exact same word to paint a negative image of this week's RNC convention?

    Dunno how that is related to the original topic unless you've given up pretense of talking about the original story and are just going down the imaginary rabbit hole of conspiracy. But I'd say the reason that phrase was so popular was because it was clever and reporters are lazy. Frankly that's the first time I've even heard it.