Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Friday February 21 2014, @03:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the totally-getting-snipped-for-my-birthday-this-year dept.

robingHood writes:

"New Scientist Magazine reports on findings that suggest that delaying fatherhood may increase the risk of fathering children with disorders such as Apert syndrome, Autism and Schizophrenia. The article reports that 'although there is a big increase in risk for many disorders, it's a big increase in a very small risk. A 40-year-old is about 50 per cent more likely to father an autistic child than a 20-year-old is, for instance, but the overall risk is only about 1 per cent to start with.' In other words: time to start mating before those tadpoles turn into toads."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by iNaya on Friday February 21 2014, @11:13AM

    by iNaya (176) on Friday February 21 2014, @11:13AM (#4227)

    Imagine this equation:
    y = 2x

    As x (time), increases, y (population) increases. In this function the growth rate of y is ALWAYS above zero and constantly decreasing. This is a linear function, not an exponential one.

  • (Score: 1) by FatPhil on Friday February 21 2014, @11:19AM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday February 21 2014, @11:19AM (#4231) Homepage

    Nope, that growth rate tends to 0.

    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 1) by FatPhil on Friday February 21 2014, @11:21AM

      by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday February 21 2014, @11:21AM (#4233) Homepage

      Oh, and did I mention that the greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.

      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday February 21 2014, @08:10PM

        by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday February 21 2014, @08:10PM (#4517) Homepage Journal

        Oh, and did I mention that the greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.

        Do you know of any other species that is better at it? Any other species that can do math at all?

        --
        The more I learn, the more I realize how abysmally ignorant I am.
        • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday February 22 2014, @12:20PM

          by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Saturday February 22 2014, @12:20PM (#4793) Homepage

          Out of the species that have developed birth control - all of them apart from the humans.

          --
          Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by iNaya on Friday February 21 2014, @11:24AM

      by iNaya (176) on Friday February 21 2014, @11:24AM (#4237)

      You are correct. The growth rate tends towards zero.

      It also always stays above zero. And it is also not exponential.