SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Sweden: man goes on trial for 2004 murder after DNA matched to genealogy site:
A 37-year-old Swedish man has gone on trial for double murder after two killings that went unsolved for more than 15 years until police matched his DNA on a popular genealogy website.
Daniel Nyqvist, who confessed to the crime shortly after his arrest last June, has been charged with the 2004 murder of a 56-year-old woman and an eight-year-old boy.
The two victims – who were unrelated – were stabbed in a random act in the quiet southern Swedish town of Linkoping [sic Linköping].
The crime shocked the nation, with investigators unable to come up with either a perpetrator or a motive, despite finding the suspect’s DNA at the scene, the weapon that was used, a bloody cap and witness descriptions of a young man with blond hair.
Police even called upon the FBI for help, but to no avail. Over the years, the case file grew to become the second biggest in Sweden’s history, after that of the 1986 murder of former prime minister Olof Palme.
The case was finally cracked when new legislation in January 2019 allowed police to search for matches to suspects’ DNA on commercial genealogy websites, which are popular among Swedes seeking long-lost relatives.
[...] “We received a match almost immediately. And several months later, the suspect could be arrested. His DNA was taken and matched 100%,” police said in a statement the day after his arrest.
How much might other repositories uncover, and are any fundamental freedoms violated by so trawling?
(Score: 2) by requerdanos on Tuesday September 22 2020, @03:47AM (2 children)
Exactly. A DNA "match" from a DNA registry is not "100% matched" as if each and every chromosome is tested (contrary to police quote above). More like "100% of the markers we tested totally matched," which leaves most of the DNA untested.
Meaning that anyone having markers in common will likely be assumed to be guilty, and be investigated as guilty, by any police agencies involved in such work.
In the US, this would be a big 4th amendment [nccs.net] no-no, not to say that that prevents it from happening--just that it's a bad thing in that it violates the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Tuesday September 22 2020, @04:08AM
so the superstitious are ahead of the curve?
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Tuesday September 22 2020, @04:11AM
https://www.bartleby.com/196/51.html [bartleby.com]
oops - missed the link
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex