SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Buying a gun in NY? Let authorities search your social media
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 28 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
And tomorrow will be like today, only more so.
-- Isaiah 56:12, New Standard Version
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Runaway1956 on Saturday July 02 2022, @01:51PM (11 children)
New York, Cali, and their fellow gun control states are most definitely usurping the authority of the Supreme Court. They have clearly stated their intent to ignore the ruling, and to find ways to go around the law of the land.
The social media nonsense? FFS, in several cases of crazies shooting up schools or whatever, the cops ALREADY KNEW of social media posts, and failed to follow up on them. If the cops don't have the resources to follow up on obvious problems, what makes anyone think that they'll find time to follow up on every application for a concealed carry?
I can agree with that. Everyone likes to point at the wording of the 2nd Amendment, and apply their own interpretation.
Alright, let's fall back, and establish that 'well regulated militia'. Every state in the union has the authority, and the obligation, to regulate the militia, and fail to do so. Every able bodied male between the ages of 17 and 40 are enrolled in the militia. And, all of them are required to undergo firearms training, along with some other minimal obligations. (National Guard doesn't count - we are attempting to 'regulate' the militia, of which the Guard is only a rather small subcomponent.)
Public schools should have, or at least have access to, approved ranges at which proper firearm training is done. Related classroom training should teach all students their rights and their responsibilities. Militia members should learn their responsibility to report careless, stupid, malicious, and illegal use of firearms. Militia members should also learn of their obligation and responsibility to respond to emergency situations, like riots. Militia members should be required to give some number of hours of community service each year - doing things like keeping demonstrations in check, so they don't become riots.
You may agree or disagree with any single point - but you should agree that it's obvious the states are not regulating the militia. If the legislators did their jobs, much of the 'problem' with guns would disappear.
Oh, I agree wholeheartedly. But, authoritarians don't give a damn what any of us think. Hochul and people who think like her want to rule our lives - all while ignoring the laws they write. Hochul doesn't want citizens to defend themselves, but she hunkers down behind 24/7 armed guards. Ditto for Biden and all those worthless congress critters, mayors, and other 'authorities' clamoring for stricter gun control.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2022, @05:53PM (7 children)
Fascist says fascist things after saying the exact opposite when he did NOT like "authority of the Supreme Court."
You truly are a disgusting spineless worm.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Saturday July 02 2022, @06:13PM
Oh, do tell. Please cite when and where I have complained about the authority of the three branches of government. You know, legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
I have often complained about the legislature not doing their jobs. Immigration, and abortion, along with a myriad of other issues that they simply fail to address.
I have also complained about the executive being given more and more power with the war powers acts. Again, that has been done because the legislative refuses to do their jobs. It's far easier to allow the president to go ahead and do stuff, than it is for the legislators to sit down, and hammer out laws and policies. It's a win-win for them. If the president does what they like, they can take credit for allowing him to do it. If they don't like what the president is doing, they can shrug off responsibility, and use the president as a scapegoat.
You've almost certainly heard me complain about activist judges. However, in these recent cases, the activists have been outnumbered by constitutionalists. That is, with Roe and Bruen, the prevailing opinion upholds exactly what the constitution says, not what a bunch of people wish it said.
The Supreme Court has used it's proper authority to rectify a previous Supreme Court's improper application of authority, in one case. In the other case, the Supreme Court has used it's proper authority to strike down an unconstitutional law.
It's all about the constitution. Either we follow it, or we scrap it.
I vote we follow the constitution. I insist on it. At such time as a constitutional convention is called, and the constitution is changed, lawfully, then we can discuss that isssue.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday July 02 2022, @06:17PM (5 children)
So spamming didn't work and now you are going for the ad hom attack? Doesn't matter who it is, you make it personal.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2022, @08:34PM
Defender of the spineless worm defends! Criticizing the ammosexual Runaway is spamming? I did not know that.
Supreme Court doesn't do "law" any more, they do Fascist Catholic now. In other news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2022, @10:12PM
Oh look, the editor supreme defending his own sock puppet. Color me shocked!!
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 03 2022, @06:16AM (2 children)
We are legion. #WeAreAristarchus
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 03 2022, @09:31AM (1 child)
Maybe, but some of us are not, but just think it was a really bad idea to censor a Soylentil on the basis of political views.
Now would be a good time for Runaway to confess (further), and apologize, and for aristarchus to be restored to our community. If this is not done, I see no future for SoylentNews.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by janrinok on Sunday July 03 2022, @09:48AM
I must have missed that - linky please.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 02 2022, @08:00PM (1 child)
California recently had an information leak where holders of concealed carry permits were exposed. It would be cool to see how many of the Hollywood types have been given the right to carry protection.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday July 02 2022, @10:01PM
The Hollyweird people may be surprisingly high, or they may be surprisingly low. Most of the high profile people can afford to hire bodyguards and/or armed guards. Why carry a gun, when you can afford to hire 3, 6, or 12 to follow you around?
(Score: 3, Insightful) by deimtee on Saturday July 02 2022, @11:03PM
You're missing the point here. The cops won't follow up anything. Applications will simply be denied.
In fact, if the law stands, I would bet that the next step would be that you must have an "approved" social media profile. Simply not having a bad one won't be good enough.
If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.