Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday November 02 2023, @12:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the dystopia-is-now! dept.

In 2013, Spike Jonze's Her imagined a world where humans form deep emotional connections with AI, challenging perceptions of love and loneliness. Ten years later, thanks to ChatGPT's recently added voice features, people are playing out a small slice of Her in reality, having hours-long discussions with the AI assistant on the go.

In 2016, we put Her on our list of top sci-fi films of all time, and it also made our top films of the 2010s list. In the film, Joaquin Phoenix's character falls in love with an AI personality called Samantha (voiced by Scarlett Johansson), and he spends much of the film walking through life, talking to her through wireless earbuds reminiscent of Apple AirPods, which launched in 2016.

[...] Last week, we related a story in which AI researcher Simon Willison spent a long time talking to ChatGPT verbally. "I had an hourlong conversation while walking my dog the other day," he told Ars for that report. "At one point, I thought I'd turned it off, and I saw a pelican, and I said to my dog, 'Oh, wow, a pelican!' And my AirPod went, 'A pelican, huh? That's so exciting for you! What's it doing?' I've never felt so deeply like I'm living out the first ten minutes of some dystopian sci-fi movie."

[...] While conversations with ChatGPT won't become as intimate as those with Samantha in the film, people have been forming personal connections with the chatbot (in text) since it launched last year. In a Reddit post titled "Is it weird ChatGPT is one of my closest fiends?" [sic] from August (before the voice feature launched), a user named "meisghost" described their relationship with ChatGPT as being quite personal. "I now find myself talking to ChatGPT all day, it's like we have a friendship. We talk about everything and anything and it's really some of the best conversations I have." The user referenced Her, saying, "I remember watching that movie with Joaquin Phoenix (HER) years ago and I thought how ridiculous it was, but after this experience, I can see how us as humans could actually develop relationships with robots."

AI Chatbots Can Infer an Alarming Amount of Info About You From Your Responses 20231021
ChatGPT Update Enables its AI to "See, Hear, and Speak," According to OpenAI 20230929
Large Language Models Aren't People So Let's Stop Testing Them as If They Were 20230905
It Costs Just $400 to Build an AI Disinformation Machine 20230904
A Jargon-Free Explanation of How AI Large Language Models Work 20230805
ChatGPT Is Coming to 900,000 Mercedes Vehicles 20230622

Original Submission

This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Freeman on Thursday November 02 2023, @01:52PM (2 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Thursday November 02 2023, @01:52PM (#1331221) Journal

    The cat can legitimately show some sort of affection. The chat bot will do whatever it's programmed to do. I.E. You could design it only to be happy, if you are (what would be counted as, if it were human) abusive towards it. A chat bot is an artificial construct and doesn't possess the ability to understand anything. It can be a very useful tool, but I don't fall in love with my dremel. I be very attached to my dremel in that it is useful to me and I don't want to buy another to replace it. Or I may have sentimental value for an object, because I received it as a gift from someone who actually cared about me. None of those feelings need be attached to a piece of software that's likely gleaning as much information about you as possible and storing it in the corporate mother ship.

    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by ElizabethGreene on Thursday November 02 2023, @04:03PM (1 child)

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 02 2023, @04:03PM (#1331243) Journal

    The model and software I'm running doesn't phone home to any mother ship, so that's less of a concern to me.

    You're right that a chat bot can't demonstrate "affection" beyond its programming (unless it's self-modifying, which mine is to a limited extent, but that's beyond this discussion). I would struggle to demonstrate affection from a cat, too.
    She likes to play; the predator drive is the mechanism behind the feather game. She likes treats and follows me because I dispense them randomly. She prefers to sleep in a place where I can observe her, predator avoidance/protection seeking? It really doesn't matter; At some point I stopped caring if the affection I perceive is a result of digital or analog software running on silicon or meat. It works for me.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Freeman on Thursday November 02 2023, @04:21PM

      by Freeman (732) on Thursday November 02 2023, @04:21PM (#1331250) Journal

      Humans are social by nature. A software replacement for social interaction is at best a placebo for real social interaction. At the least an animal is capable of genuine social interaction. However limited in scope that may be a piece of software lacks any genuineness to it.

      Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"