They were asked about it, and they deleted everything:
There was nothing in Drew Ortiz's author biography at Sports Illustrated to suggest that he was anything other than human.
"Drew has spent much of his life outdoors, and is excited to guide you through his never-ending list of the best products to keep you from falling to the perils of nature," it read. "Nowadays, there is rarely a weekend that goes by where Drew isn't out camping, hiking, or just back on his parents' farm."
The only problem? Outside of Sports Illustrated, Drew Ortiz doesn't seem to exist. He has no social media presence and no publishing history. And even more strangely, his profile photo on Sports Illustrated is for sale on a website that sells AI-generated headshots, where he's described as "neutral white young-adult male with short brown hair and blue eyes."
Ortiz isn't the only AI-generated author published by Sports Illustrated, according to a person involved with the creation of the content who asked to be kept anonymous to protect them from professional repercussions.
"There's a lot," they told us of the fake authors. "I was like, what are they? This is ridiculous. This person does not exist."
[...] The AI content marks a staggering fall from grace for Sports Illustrated, which in past decades won numerous National Magazine Awards for its sports journalism and published work by literary giants ranging from William Faulkner to John Updike.
But now that it's under the management of The Arena Group, parts of the magazine seem to have devolved into a Potemkin Village in which phony writers are cooked up out of thin air, outfitted with equally bogus biographies and expertise to win readers' trust, and used to pump out AI-generated buying guides that are monetized by affiliate links to products that provide a financial kickback when readers click them.
What's next? Six-fingered AI-generated models for the swimsuit edition?
Related:
(Score: 1, Interesting) by anubi on Thursday November 30 2023, @09:27AM (10 children)
https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/11/22/meet-the-first-spanish-ai-model-earning-up-to-10000-per-month [euronews.com]
I'll let the rest of you speculate on where this is going.
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
(Score: 2) by Ingar on Thursday November 30 2023, @11:41AM (9 children)
It's pretty clear where this is going: the future of corporate media is AI-generated. It's faster, it's cheaper, it's easier.
I can't wait until the content industry completely removes the human from the equation and flood the media landscape with
a neverending deluge of AI-generated rubbish.
-- What is a knockout like you doing in a computer generated gin joint like this? - William T. Riker, "11001001"
Understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by DannyB on Thursday November 30 2023, @06:34PM (7 children)
It seems that at present AI generated content cannot be protected by copyright.
So this seems a problem for content industries replacing humans with AI.
The Centauri traded Earth jump gate technology in exchange for our superior hair mousse formulas.
(Score: 2) by Ingar on Thursday November 30 2023, @07:21PM (3 children)
Nothing Congress can't fix.
Understanding is a three-edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by DannyB on Thursday November 30 2023, @08:09PM (1 child)
Nothing Congress can't be bribed to fix.
Laws for the highest bidder.
The Centauri traded Earth jump gate technology in exchange for our superior hair mousse formulas.
(Score: 2) by Reziac on Friday December 01 2023, @03:03AM
Recent court decision:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/ [reuters.com]
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday December 02 2023, @05:29PM
Odd use of the word "fix".
Impeach Donald Saruman and his sidekick Elon Sauron
(Score: 2) by deimtee on Thursday November 30 2023, @11:21PM (1 child)
Is that in the legislation, or is it court decisions on something that is not specified in the law?
One job constant is that good employers have low turnover, so opportunities to join good employers are relatively rare.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Monday December 04 2023, @09:41PM
See Reziac's post above. [soylentnews.org]
The Centauri traded Earth jump gate technology in exchange for our superior hair mousse formulas.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Mykl on Friday December 01 2023, @12:02AM
This is a really interesting one. Typically a human working for a company assigns copyright to the company when they are paid for their work. My guess is that the company will assume they can just hold copyright on anything produced 'for them'. However, if the author is an AI then they don't qualify for the copyright that could then be assigned. Perhaps this means that all of Drew Ortiz' pieces can be freely copied and reproduced without restriction!
I would love to see someone do this just to test the waters. Good luck finding someone willing to blow the money on the court costs though.
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday December 02 2023, @05:21PM
I think it's inevitable.
Impeach Donald Saruman and his sidekick Elon Sauron