Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Wednesday March 27 2024, @08:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-didn't-know-that-... dept.

https://buttondown.email/hillelwayne/archive/why-do-regexes-use-and-as-line-anchors/

Last week I fell into a bit of a rabbit hole: why do regular expressions use $ and ^ as line anchors?1

This talk brings up that they first appeared in Ken Thompson's port of the QED text editor. In his manual he writes: b) "^" is a regular expression which matches character at the beginning of a line.

c) "$" is a regular expression which matches character before the character (usually at the end of a line)

QED was the precursor to ed, which was instrumental in popularizing regexes, so a lot of its design choices stuck.

Okay, but then why did Ken Thompson choose those characters?


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday March 28 2024, @01:24PM (2 children)

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Thursday March 28 2024, @01:24PM (#1350674) Homepage Journal

    And, of course, Algol 68. Which introduced an algebra of types, which became the type system of C after some syntax changes that made it harder to understand.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Thursday March 28 2024, @01:48PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) on Thursday March 28 2024, @01:48PM (#1350678) Homepage Journal

    And some semantic changes that made it significantly less secure. And easier to implement.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by bzipitidoo on Thursday March 28 2024, @08:12PM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Thursday March 28 2024, @08:12PM (#1350753) Journal

    And then, after ALGOL 68, the language just vanished. Did you ever wonder what happened to it? Pascal, that's what. ALGOL W was an alternate vision for the next version of ALGOL that was rejected in favor of what became ALGOL 68. ALGOL W was then used as the basis for Pascal.