Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Wednesday March 12, @07:09PM   Printer-friendly

DOGE axes CISA 'red team' staffers amid ongoing federal cuts:

Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has fired more than a hundred employees working for the U.S. government's cybersecurity agency CISA, including "red team" staffers, two people affected by the layoffs told TechCrunch.

The people, who asked not to be named, said affected employees were axed immediately when their network access was revoked with no prior warning.

The layoffs, which happened in late February and early March, are the latest round of staff cuts to hit the federal cybersecurity agency since the start of the Trump administration.

CISA spokesperson Tess Hyre declined to comment on the latest round of job cuts affecting the agency and wouldn't say how many employees had been affected. Hyre told TechCrunch that CISA's red team "remains operational" but said the agency is "reviewing all contracts to ensure that they align with the priorities of the new administration."

One of the people affected told TechCrunch that CISA red team employees, who simulate real-world attacks to identify security weaknesses in networks before attackers do, were affected by the DOGE-enforced cuts.

Another person affected by the layoffs, who asked to remain anonymous due to fear of government retaliation, told TechCrunch that laid-off employees also include staffers who worked for CISA's Cyber Incident Response Team (CIRT), which is responsible for penetration testing and vulnerability management of networks belonging to U.S. federal government departments and agencies.

[...] This is by our count the third known round of job cuts to affect CISA employees since January 20. More than 130 CISA employees were cut by DOGE earlier in February, according to reports, and several CISA employees working on election security were placed on leave in January.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday March 13, @12:24PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 13, @12:24PM (#1396230) Journal

    None of those lines take a detour through DOGE, and orders or "suggestions" outside the chain of command are illegal by definition, are they not?

    They wouldn't be outside the chain of command because once again, it would be under the authority of Trump. The rest of your post is irrelevant. This would be far from the first time that a presidential order/act had unintended consequences or a president weren't fully informed of those consequences - or merely appeared to be so uninformed.

    Either way, my understanding is that a good chunk of the federal "staff" are completely protected from DOGE's efforts unless the order is signed by Trump personally, which means either Trump will have to man up and take responsibility or there are going to have to be deeper cuts made where it's possible for DOGE to do so autonomously.

    Trump has played that game before: relying on Director Anthony Fauci to coordinate the US response to the covid pandemic while simultaneously using him as a blame sink for Trump's failures to properly handle the same. DOGE's achievements will be credited to Trump, their failings will be their own.