Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
Politics
posted by mrpg on Friday January 15 2021, @02:01PM   Printer-friendly

'No longer acceptable' for platforms to take key decisions alone, EU Commission says

It is "no longer acceptable" for social media giants to take key decisions on online content removals alone, following the high profile takedowns of US President Trump's accounts on Facebook and Twitter, the European Commission has said.

Trump's accounts have been suspended by the two platforms for inciting calls to violence ahead of the violent riots that hit Washington's Capitol Hill last week.

Speaking to lawmakers on Monday (11 January), Prabhat Agarwal, an official who heads up the eCommerce unit at the European Commission's DG Connect, noted how the EU executive's Digital Services Act attempts to realign the balance between effective content removal and preserving freedom of expression online.

"It is no longer acceptable in our view that platforms take some key decisions by themselves alone without any supervision, without any accountability, and without any sort of dialogue or transparency for the kind of decisions that they're taking," Agarwal said.

"Freedom of expression is really a key value in this," he told the European Parliament's internal market committee.

The comments came following concerns raised by some lawmakers in the European Parliament following the suspension of Trump's social media accounts. In doing so, platforms giants had demonstrated that they yield a disproportionate degree of power over the freedom of speech online.

"The fact that platforms like Twitter and Facebook decide who can speak freely is dangerous," Green MEP Kim van Sparrentak said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2021, @05:06PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2021, @05:06PM (#1100632)

    Can I introduce you to the DoD, if you think that the public education system is inefficient, the DoD is an order of magnitude of orders of magnitude worse. They'll literally lose entire pallets of cash and nobody with any power seems to think this is a problem.

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by mhajicek on Friday January 15 2021, @05:36PM

    by mhajicek (51) on Friday January 15 2021, @05:36PM (#1100650)

    It's working as intended. It's extremely efficient in its true objective of funneling money into certain pockets.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2021, @06:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2021, @06:53PM (#1100719)

    They don't see it as a problem because they know exactly where those pallets of money went: To bribing local warlords. The bribes themselves were all off the books so that no warlord would know (and complain about) if or how much any of the others got paid.