SoylentNews

mendax [soylentnews.org] writes:

The New York Times has a story [nytimes.com] about how the Harvard Law School is doing what almost no library has ever done before in order to prepare for the digital age. It's painful for me as a book lover to read this story but it's all for a good cause:

[I]n a digital-age sacrifice intended to serve grand intentions, the Harvard librarians are slicing off the spines of all but the rarest volumes and feeding some 40 million pages through a high-speed scanner. They are taking this once unthinkable step to create a complete, searchable database of American case law that will be offered free on the Internet, allowing instant retrieval of vital records that usually must be paid for. [...]

For many years now, bookcases of legal tomes in law offices have been mostly for show. Rather than spending days poring over book indexes and footnoted citations, as law clerks and associates did in earlier times, researchers find what they need on the Internet in minutes. But that nearly always comes at a price. [...]

Legal groups spend anywhere from thousands of dollars a year, for a small office, to millions, for a giant firm, using commercial services like Westlaw and LexisNexis to find cases and trace doctrinal strands. [...]

Complete state results will become publicly available this fall for California and New York, and the entire library will be online in 2017, said Daniel Lewis, chief executive and co-founder of Ravel Law, a commercial start-up in California that has teamed up with Harvard Law for the project. The cases will be available at www.ravellaw.com [ravellaw.com]. Ravel is paying millions of dollars to support the scanning. The cases will be accessible in a searchable format and, along with the texts, they will be presented with visual maps developed by the company, which graphically show the evolution through cases of a judicial concept and how each key decision is cited in others.

While this sounds like this is just another way to make money from public domain legal documents and court opinions (and it is), there is an important distinction:

Under the agreement with Harvard, the entire underlying database, not just limited search results, will be shared with nonprofit organizations and scholars that wish to develop specialized applications. Ravel and Harvard will withhold the database from other commercial groups for eight years. After that, it will be available to anyone for any purpose....

So, geeks such as myself who have some modicum of legal training have some time to put on their thinking caps and find ways of making money out of this information. For everyone else, this could be a way of evening out the playing field in court cases, when the [aclu.org] Davids [eff.org] goes after Goliath [nsa.gov]

Original Submission