Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.

Submission Preview

Link to Story

Judge didn't get the memo: Rules no right to Ohotograph Police

Accepted submission by frojack at 2016-02-24 03:45:21
Digital Liberty

Plaintiffs had no First Amendment right to take cellphone video of police [abajournal.com], federal judge rules.

A federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled that citizens don’t have a First Amendment right to take cellphone videos of police unless they are challenging or criticizing the police conduct.

A Temple University student, took a cellphone photo of about 20 police officers standing outside a house party because he thought it would be an interesting picture.

In a separate incident, a trained legal observer tried to move closer to see and possibly record an arrest during a protest of hydraulic fracturing.

The cases were consolidated (for un-stated reasons) and U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney said that both subjects would have to show their behavior was “expressive conduct” to support a First Amendment claim.

Neither plaintiff could meet that burden because neither told the police at the time why they wanted to capture the images.


Original Submission