Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Submission Preview

Link to Story

Judge didn't get the memo: Rules no right to Ohotograph Police

Accepted submission by frojack at 2016-02-24 03:45:21
Digital Liberty

Plaintiffs had no First Amendment right to take cellphone video of police [abajournal.com], federal judge rules.

A federal judge in Philadelphia has ruled that citizens don’t have a First Amendment right to take cellphone videos of police unless they are challenging or criticizing the police conduct.

A Temple University student, took a cellphone photo of about 20 police officers standing outside a house party because he thought it would be an interesting picture.

In a separate incident, a trained legal observer tried to move closer to see and possibly record an arrest during a protest of hydraulic fracturing.

The cases were consolidated (for un-stated reasons) and U.S. District Judge Mark Kearney said that both subjects would have to show their behavior was “expressive conduct” to support a First Amendment claim.

Neither plaintiff could meet that burden because neither told the police at the time why they wanted to capture the images.


Original Submission