SoylentNews

AnonTechie [soylentnews.org] writes:

The Mathematics Of Murder: Should A Robot Sacrifice Your Life To Save Two?

It happens quickly-more quickly than you, being human, can fully process. A front tire blows, and your autonomous SUV swerves. But rather than veering left, into the opposing lane of traffic, the robotic vehicle steers right. Brakes engage, the system tries to correct itself, but there's too much momentum. Like a cornball stunt in a bad action movie, you are over the cliff, in free fall. Your robot, the one you paid good money for, has chosen to kill you. Better that, its collision-response algorithms decided, than a high-speed, head-on collision with a smaller, non-robotic compact. There were two people in that car, to your one. The math couldn't be simpler. This, roughly speaking, is the problem presented by Patrick Lin, an associate philosophy professor and director of the Ethics + Emerging Sciences Group at California Polytechnic State University. In a recent opinion piece for Wired, Lin explored one of the most disturbing questions in robot ethics: If a crash is unavoidable, should an autonomous car choose who it slams into?

http://www.wired.com/2014/05/the-robot-car-of-tomo rrow-might-just-be-programmed-to-hit-you/ [wired.com]

http://www.popsci.com/blog-network/zero-moment/mat hematics-murder-should-robot-sacrifice-your-life-s ave-two [popsci.com]

http://people.howstuffworks.com/trolley-problem.ht m [howstuffworks.com]

---

Original Submission