SoylentNews

aristarchus [soylentnews.org] writes:

So now, Soylentils, at long last, we are at the point where a decision is to be made. Do we accept submissions composed entirely of the term "alt-right" repeated ad nausem, or do we demand that when the Editors suggest that a submitter correct a submission, and re-submit it, as if that meant there was some chance of the submission being accepted, instead of just a dismissal of political views that do not sympathize with the Techische Neue Recht predisposition of the Editors of the SoylentNews, that there is some chance of acceptance?

In this spirit, and along the lines of #Freearistarchus!, I offer a "fixed" version of the "alt-right" submission that is causing so much of a twitter amoung Soylentilati. Viola!

As reported in SoylentNews [soylentnews.org], some people believe that the alt-right is not repeated enough in SoylentNews submissions.
[Note: the generation of self-referential references was a common practice of the Federalist Society, particulary in their articles defending the Second Amendment. But since it was a daisy-chain of pederastry, the references amount to a damp squid. [reddit.com] ]

Thus, the original submission:

Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right
Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right

Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right

Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right Alt-right .

Alt-right .

For janrinok.

  Now from this, we learn several things, which is more than we learned from "The Case of the Missing Journal", as much as martyb did his best to get to the bottom of it. First, janrinok has it in for aristarchus. We knew that. Second, The Mighty Buzzard has still not confessed his responsibility for the entire sotted affair, and until he does, well, carrion will prevail.

But more, and explicitely to the point, janrinok in IRC stated that he was writing a script to identify "aristarchus sub" and "alt-right" with an automatic rejection. At first I cried at the cruelty of the man, but then I realized he had a point, that automatization could replace us all, especially Andrew Yang, and so I set him up the bomb, a submission that his script could not fail to detect and reject.

Only problem is, the script still invited me to re-edit, and resubmit. So here we are. Your move, janrinok!

Original Submission