SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submission Preview
Cause of oversized placentas in cloning found after two decades
Story automatically generated by StoryBot Version 0.2.2 rel Testing.
Storybot ('Arthur T Knackerbracket') has been converted to Python3
Note: This is the complete story and will need further editing. It may also be covered
by Copyright and thus should be acknowledged and quoted rather than printed in its entirety.
FeedSource: [PhysOrg]
Time: 2020-07-10 12:58:20 UTC
Original URL: https://phys.org/news/2020-07-oversized-placentas-cloning-decades.html [phys.org] using UTF-8 encoding.
Title: Cause of oversized placentas in cloning found after two decades
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- Entire Story Below --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Cause of oversized placentas in cloning found after two decades
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story [phys.org]:
Click here to sign in withor
Forget Password? [sciencex.com]
Learn more [sciencex.com]
share this!
101
19
Share
July 10, 2020
One reason a technique for cloning animals often results in oversized placentas, and hence failed births, has been uncovered in mice by an all-RIKEN team. This finding will help improve the success rate of the cloning method and could also shed light on fertility treatments for people.
googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1449240174198-2'); });
The cloning method known as somatic cell [phys.org] nuclear transfer (SCNT) made headlines in 1997 when Dolly the sheep became the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. It involves swapping the nucleus of an egg cell from the mother with a nucleus from a normal somatic cell from the nuclear donor animal and then placing the egg into the uterus of a surrogate mother. SCNT is a powerful tool for basic research, medicine, agriculture and environmental science.
However, despite significant progress, SCNT's birth rate is still well below that of natural fertilization. One reason for this is that the placentas of the artificially fertilized embryos are often abnormally large, which frequently leads to developmental complications. But even after 20 years of research, the cause of this problem has remained a mystery.
Now, Kimiko Inoue, Atsuo Ogura, and their co-workers, all at the RIKEN BioResource Research Center, have discovered that the overexpression of the largest imprinted microRNA clusters in mice is one of the main reasons why SCNT often produces placentas that are too large. When they corrected for this, they were able to double the birth rate.
A process known as genomic imprinting guides the early development of mammals by switching certain genes [phys.org] on and off as the embryo and placenta develop and grow. This can lead to the expression of genes from only one parent, depending on small molecules [phys.org] attached to the genetic sequence called epigenetic marks [phys.org]. The team found that SCNT placentas' lack of genomic imprinting based on the epigenetic mark histone methylation goes a long way to explaining their abnormal size.
"DNA methylation is the main epigenetic mark that governs this expression system," says Inoue. "However, imprinting specific to the placenta [phys.org] is regulated by trimethylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 and this represses the expression of the mother's gene."
Inoue wasn't expecting to find that the culprit was a microRNA that didn't code for proteins. "I was surprised to discover that a non-protein-coding microRNA, and not a protein-coding gene, was the main cause of the oversized placentas produced by SCNT," she says.
The study has repercussions beyond SCNT. "We've demonstrated that non-coding microRNA plays an essential role in the healthy development of placentas," says Inoue. "I anticipate this will help us understand placental abnormalities and develop gene markers for assisted reproductive technologies for people."
Explore further
Feedback to editors
12 hours ago
13 hours ago
Jul 09, 2020
Jul 09, 2020
Jul 09, 2020
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
9 hours ago
9 hours ago
11 hours ago
11 hours ago
11 hours ago
3 hours ago
5 hours ago
12 hours ago
Jul 09, 2020
Jul 08, 2020
Jul 08, 2020
More from Biology and Medical [physicsforums.com]
Jun 19, 2020
Dec 27, 2019
Jul 19, 2018
Aug 16, 2013
Jun 30, 2020
Jul 03, 2018
11 hours ago
13 hours ago
13 hours ago
Jul 09, 2020
Jul 09, 2020
Jul 09, 2020
Your feedback will go directly to Science X editors.
Thank you for taking your time to send in your valued opinion to Science X editors.
You can be assured our editors closely monitor every feedback sent and will take appropriate actions. Your opinions are important to us.
We do not guarantee individual replies due to extremely high volume of correspondence.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose.
The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.
Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
More information [sciencex.com]
Privacy policy [sciencex.com]
Medical Xpress covers all medical research advances and health news
Tech Xplore covers the latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
Science X Network offers the most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web
This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, and provide content from third parties.
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy [sciencex.com]
and Terms of Use [sciencex.com].
-- submitted from IRC
