Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.

Submission Preview

Supreme Court reins in definition of crime under controversial hacking law

Rejected submission by Freeman at 2021-06-04 14:36:42 from the too little too late dept.
News

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2021/06/supreme-court-limits-reach-of-hacking-law-that-us-used-to-prosecute-aaron-swartz/ [arstechnica.com]

The Supreme Court issued a ruling Thursday [supremecourt.gov] that imposes a limit on what counts as a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).

The case involves a former Georgia police sergeant who "used his own, valid credentials" to get information about a license plate number from a law enforcement database, the court decision said. The sergeant ran the search in exchange for money and for non-law enforcement purposes, violating a department policy. He was charged with a felony under the CFAA, which says it's a crime when someone "intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access." He was convicted and sentenced to 18 months in prison in May 2018 [justice.gov].

A federal appeals court upheld the conviction, but the Supreme Court reversed it today in a 6-3 decision that said Van Buren did not violate the CFAA. Justices found that the cybersecurity statute does not make it a crime to obtain information from a computer when the person has authorized access to that machine, even if the person has "improper motives."


Original Submission