SoylentNews

upstart [soylentnews.org] writes:

████ # This file was generated bot-o-matically! Edit at your own risk. ████

Meta (Facebook, Instagram) switching to "Legitimate Interest" for Ads [noyb.eu]:

Meta (Facebook, Instagram) switching to "Legitimate Interest" for ads after noyb win. noyb will instantly take action to also stop this illegal practice next

As the Wall Street Journal [wsj.com] reports, Meta (Facebook and Instagram) is switching from an illegal contract to equally illegal basis "legitimate interests" for advertisement, after noyb won a series of complaints against them. noyb will take imminent action, as the clear case law and guidance does not allow a company to argue that its interests in profits overrides the users' right to privacy.

Background. The GDPR allows to process personal data if a company complies with at least one of six legal basis in Article 6 GDPR. Most of these six options are irrelevant for advertisement. While most companies require users to consent ("opt-in") for the use of personal data for advertisement, Meta (Facebook and Instagram) have tried to bypass this requirement by arguing that the use of personal data for ads is "necessary under the contract" when the GDPR became applicable in 2018. noyb has instantly filed a series of complaints [noyb.eu] and ultimately won them before the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) in December 2022 [noyb.eu]. Meta got until April to stop the practice.

One illegal practice replaced by next illegal practice. Now Meta announces to give in against the pressure by noyb [fb.com], but instead of switching to an "opt-in" system, like Google or Microsoft, they now try to argue the next unlawful option, by claiming that their "legitimate interest" to process user data would override the fundamental right to privacy and data protection of users. This was tried by other companies before, but rejected by the regulators multiple times (see e.g. the Italian DPA on TikTok [europa.eu] or the Belgian DPA on the IAB TCF [autoriteprotectiondonnees.be] at para 441).

Max Schrems: "While some still argue that advertisment would override the fundamental rights of users, this is a minority view. We are not aware of anyone arguing that profiling and tracking at the scale of Meta just to get some  ad clicks would fulfill that test."

noyb will take imminent action. noyb has already prepared for this option and will take imminent action once Meta has made that switch on 5 April. For strategic reasons we will announce the details of our action at a later point in time.

Max Schrems: "Meta is switching one illegal practice for another illegal practice. noyb will take imminent legal action to stop this charade, as it is clear that the Irish Regulator of Meta will again be inactive. This is an absurd game and we will stop it as quickly as possible. Like any other company, Meta needs to have a clear yes/no option for users, where they must actively say yes if they want to give up their fundamental rights.This system of using legitimate interest at least allows for opt-out, which makes it a slight improvement for users."

[This first reaction will be updated during the course of the day.]

Related articles Recent articles Irish Data Protection Authority gives € 3.97 billion present to Meta. Jan 17, 2023 The DPC has turned a blind eye on the revenue generated by Meta from violating the GDPR since 2018. Ignoring the EDPB demand to include the unlawful revenue of Meta, reduced the fine by 3,97 Mrd EUR. [noyb.eu] Meta Advertising Ban - Decision Published Jan 11, 2023 You can now read the details of the DPC decision! It seems interesting times lie before us in the Courts! [noyb.eu]

Original Submission