SoylentNews

NotSanguine [soylentnews.org] writes:

Ars Technica is reporting on a Minnesota law [mn.gov] passed this week which, according to the article [arstechnica.com]:

Minnesota this week eliminated two laws that made it harder for cities and towns to build their own broadband networks. The state-imposed restrictions were repealed in an omnibus commerce policy bill [mn.gov] [N.B., this link is not valid (Geo-Blocked, perhaps? I'm not in MN). I retained it as it is in TFA. See link to the MN House journal [mn.gov] above] signed on Tuesday by Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat.

Minnesota was previously one of about 20 states [arstechnica.com] that imposed significant restrictions on municipal broadband. The number [broadbandnow.com] can differ depending on who's counting [localnetchoice.org] because of disagreements over what counts as a significant restriction. But the list has gotten smaller in recent years because states including Arkansas [arstechnica.com], Colorado [arstechnica.com], and Washington [arstechnica.com] repealed laws that hindered municipal broadband.

The Minnesota bill enacted this week struck down [mn.gov] a requirement that municipal telecommunications networks be approved in an election with 65 percent of the vote. The law is over a century old, the Institute for Local Self-Reliance's Community Broadband Network Initiative wrote [communitynets.org] yesterday.

"Though intended to regulate telephone service, the way the law had been interpreted after the invention of the Internet was to lump broadband in with telephone service thereby imposing that super-majority threshold to the building of broadband networks," the broadband advocacy group said.

The Minnesota omnibus bill also changed a law that let municipalities build broadband networks, but only if no private providers offer service or will offer service "in the reasonably foreseeable future." That restriction had been in effect since at least the year 2000 [mn.gov].

The caveat that prevented municipalities from competing against private providers was eliminated from the law when this week's omnibus bill was passed. As a result [mn.gov], the law now lets cities and towns "improve, construct, extend, and maintain facilities for Internet access and other communications purposes" even if private ISPs already offer service.

[Note to Editors: Many of the links in TFA point at 'https://revisor.mn.gov' with long search strings that don't render properly for me )is this just a 'me' issue?). This is *news* and should, IMNSHO, be discussed here. While the Ars piece (because of the crappy links) is flawed, it seems like the best reporting on this new law. As always, it's up to you guys whether or not to post this to the front page. You'd think Ars and Jon Brodkin would be more careful about vetting links before publication. That we push that sort of thing harder than Ars seems odd. Go figure.]

I sure wish I could get municipal broadband. How about you Soylentils? Do you have municipal broadband? Does your ISP have competition at all? Abusive terms of service? Data caps?

Original Submission