SoylentNews

upstart [soylentnews.org] writes:

████ # This file was generated bot-o-matically! Edit at your own risk. ████

anti-Musk propaganda

SpaceX: Actually, Dying Starlink Satellites Don't Always Fully Burn Up [pcmag.com]:

SpaceX is warning that retired Starlink satellites might not always fully disintegrate upon re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere. Small remnants may survive and land on the ground.

The company made the statement [starlink.com] on Thursday as SpaceX has been de-orbiting and retiring hundreds of older Starlink satellites by plunging them back into the Earth’s atmosphere, which should incinerate the hardware. All Starlink satellites were designed to orbit for about five years.

SpaceX has previously said that Starlink satellites have been engineered to “fully demise [pcmag.com]” during atmospheric re-entry, thus posing no threat to the public. But in Thursday’s statement, the company said small fragments from the burning debris can continue to fly toward Earth.

This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed. [twitter.com]

Still, the company maintains that satellite debris poses no danger. For example, the chance of the company’s newest Starlink satellites causing human harm has been rated at “less than 1 in 100 million, significantly more conservative than the current industry standard."

It's unclear if the risk is higher for older Starlink satellites launched five years ago. But SpaceX says it adopted a "more conservative approach" than current US regulations, which require [nasa.gov] operators to keep the risk levels of falling space debris from causing a human casualty to under 1 in 10,000.

Although the company’s newest V2 mini Starlink satellites should disintegrate if they’re sent burning through the atmosphere, SpaceX also noted: “We predict that approximately 5% of the mass of the entire satellite could survive reentry.”

“The biggest contributor (~90% of the surviving mass) is silicon from the solar cells, which has a high melting point and a very low ballistic coefficient, which could survive reentry in extremely small fragments,” the company added. That said, if any silicon fragments survive, they will end up landing on Earth with less than one joule of energy — or about how much energy it takes to lift an apple [universetoday.com].

(Credit: SpaceX)

While the falling silicon debris should be harmless, SpaceX noted that the magnetic ceramic materials in “the core of inductors and transformers” of a Starlink satellite can also survive re-entry. As a result, the company says it is “limiting the size and the mass of each inductor core, even at the cost of reducing their efficiency and increasing the complexity of the system design.”

In one rare instance, the company also revealed that "a 2.5 kg piece of aluminum" found on farm grounds in Saskatchewan, Canada, was traced to a Starlink satellite. Specifically, the surviving aluminum came from "a modem enclosure lid of the backhaul antenna on a Starlink direct-to-cell satellite, SpaceX said. That aluminum part was supposed to disintegrate during re-entry.

But the 5-pound metallic part likely survived because the satellite had failed to properly de-orbit. The satellite was among 20 [pcmag.com] Starlink satellites launched in July that later fell back to Earth due to a malfunction during launch. "Learnings from this event were quickly incorporated into the design of the V2mini optimized satellite," the company added.

SpaceX also says its approach to safety includes ensuring that any debris fragments land with less than 3 joules of energy —well below the US regulatory threshold, which considers objects exceeding 15 joules a potential human casualty risk. “For reference, 15 Joules of energy corresponds to roughly that of a 1.7" piece of hail,” the company said.

Recommended by Our Editors Hughesnet Loses Another 117K Users As Battle With Starlink Continues [pcmag.com]Elon Musk Slams Verizon's Tech, Pushes for FAA to Adopt Starlink [pcmag.com]Starlink's Waitlist Expands in the US, Spreading East [pcmag.com]

In the same report, SpaceX points out it’s preparing to de-orbit 329 Starlink satellites. The company also says it’s already de-orbited 865. The numbers align with findings from astronomer and satellite watcher Jonathan McDowell, who’s spotted SpaceX de-orbiting about four to five [pcmag.com] Starlink sats per day.

The increasing number of disposals might spark concerns about Starlink debris landing over populated areas. But SpaceX says it always tries to retire the satellites “over the open ocean, away from populated islands and heavily trafficked airline and maritime routes.”

That didn’t occur in January when one five-year-old Starlink satellite was recorded [x.com] blazing through the night skies over northern Illinois. Michael Nicolls, VP of Starlink Engineering, attributed [x.com] the botched re-entry to “degraded attitude control.” Thursday’s statement from SpaceX adds that this requires controlling the satellite at very low altitudes, under 125 kilometers, or “far below the design requirement of these early Starlink vehicles.”

Since then, the company has improved the altitude control systems for its newer V2 and upcoming V3 satellites. In addition, SpaceX has been conducting experimental tests simulating atmospheric re-entry conditions and whether the conditions will disintegrate the printed circuit boards used in the satellites.

The company currently has [planet4589.org] over 7,000 satellites in orbit and plans to launch thousands more. The growing scale of the constellation promises to improve the speeds and internet quality of Starlink, which is already serving over 4.6 million users. But the satellite internet system has also sparked calls for more government scrutiny [pcmag.com] into Starlink's potential environmental [pcmag.com] impact.

Get Our Best Stories!

Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

EmailSign Me Up

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. By clicking the button, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use [ziffdavis.com] and Privacy Policy [ziffdavis.com]. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.

Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters [pcmag.com] About Michael Kan Senior Reporter Read the latest from Michael Kan

• No Fiber Needed: New Chip Uses Light to Beam 10Gig Speeds Through the Air [pcmag.com]
• Rocket Lab Debuts Satellite Model That Could Compete With Starlink [pcmag.com]
• Intel's $28 Billion Ohio Factory Delayed Again, Won't Open Until 2030 [pcmag.com]
• Hughesnet Loses Another 117K Users As Battle With Starlink Continues [pcmag.com]
• Are TV Commercials Too Loud? FCC to Investigate, Eyes Streaming Services [pcmag.com]
• More from Michael Kan [pcmag.com]

Original Submission