Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.

Submission Preview

Link to Story

The Political Effects of Xitter’s Feed Algorithm

Accepted submission by canopic jug at 2026-02-20 07:19:23 from the still-ignoring-the-election-interference dept.
Security

Blogger Ben Werdmuller has discussed an article in Nature about the political impact of the algorithm(s) used by X (formerly known as Twitter) [werd.io]. The gist is that the use of the algorithms against X's users tends to shift about 5% of them in a specific direction. That's more than enough to tip an election on way or another especially since the damage seems persistent and lasts even after exposure ceases.

Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects1. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk’s platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users’ feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X’s algorithm has persistent effects on users’ current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

The political effects of X’s feed algorithm [nature.com]. Nature

It should be added that the effect has already been seen in multiple countries. For example, the elections in Turkey were affected with outright censorship [stockholmcf.org], within X. And the impact from the CPP's Bytedance's Tiktok is likely even more severe, not to mention multiple experiments in manipulation [medium.com] in Meta's properties like Facebook.

Previously:
(2026) How Screwed is Generation Alpha, and the Generations Which Will Depend on Them? [soylentnews.org]
(2025) European Union Orders X to Hand Over Algorithm Documents [soylentnews.org]
(2024) Six Months Ago NPR Left Twitter. The Effects Have Been Negligible [soylentnews.org]
(2023) Utah Sues Tiktok For Getting Children ‘Addicted’ To Its Algorithm [soylentnews.org]
(2022) Leaked Documents Reveal Instagram Was Pushing Girls Towards Content That Harmed Mental Health [soylentnews.org]
(2022) Musk Buying Twitter Is Not About Freedom of Speech [soylentnews.org]
... and more


Original Submission