SoylentNews

coolgopher [soylentnews.org] writes:

Following Codeberg [codeberg.org] already doing so [codeberg.org], independent software development platform SourceHut [sourcehut.org] moves to prohibit LLM content on their platform. Their announcement [sourcehut.org] is quite informative and with plenty of references to back up their reasoning. I particularly like this part:

As software engineers we have front-row seats for the deployment of one of the world’s fastest growing energy consumers: AI. Our conscience calls us to resist the deployment of technologies which will exacerbate death and suffering for millions. AI might deliver benefits to society, but the cost is so high that we need to make careful decisions about how it’s deployed and if the benefits to society outweigh those costs. On the whole, vibe coding does not deliver benefits which, in the view of SourceHut and our community, outweigh the costs. Cheap, green electricity, preservation of freshwater resources, husbanding our planet and its wildlife: these are all much more important than AI-assisted coding.

The broader social and economic consequences add to the alarm. These tools are disrupting labor and increasing the already unprecedented gap between the haves and the have-nots. These companies pay minimum wage in inhumane conditions in impoverished countries for the labor they exploit to train models that can be applied to taking the bottom out of the labor market in wealthy countries. Moreover, the accumulated wealth of the AI owners, and the depleted resources of the AI proletariat, is further exploited to consolidate power, enable the rise of fascism, and destroy the social order alongside the environmental order. AI is being used to deport immigrants without due process, surveil and police poor and racialized communities, manipulate elections and political discourse, facilitate crimes against humanity at scale, and amplify injustices in our institutions.

Finally, AI simply seems to be bad for the people who use it. Many open source maintainers complain of being exhausted by a deluge of low-quality AI generated contributions. AI has been linked to “deskilling”, making its users worse at problem solving and other cognitive tasks. And the number of people who have been talked into psychosis or suicide by their chatbots continues to rise.

These concerns are myriad, credible, and demand action. Our small contribution to the problem is to clearly state our position on the matter and adjust our policies to provide a safe platform for people who are concious of these issues to work and find community.

I feel like we're heading in the direction of a schism, with open source communities on the one side, and corporations and business aligned individuals and projects on the other.

---

Original Submission