Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday August 05 2020, @04:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the operative-word-is-"could" dept.

MMR Vaccine Could Protect Against the Worst Symptoms of COVID-19 :

"Administering the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine could serve as a preventive measure to dampen septic inflammation associated with COVID-19 infection

[...] The protection was mediated by long-lived myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) previously reported inhibiting septic inflammation and mortality in several experimental models.

[...] The milder symptoms seen in the 955 sailors on the U.S.S Roosevelt who tested positive for COVID-19 (only one hospitalization) may have been a consequence of the fact that the MMR vaccinations are given to all U.S. Navy recruits. In addition, epidemiological data suggest a correlation between people in geographical locations who routinely receive the MMR vaccine and reduced COVID-19 death rates. COVID-19 has not had a big impact on children, and the researchers hypothesize that one reason children are protected against viral infections that induce sepsis is their more recent and more frequent exposures to live attenuated vaccines that can also induce the trained suppressive MDSCs that limit inflammation and sepsis."


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:21PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:21PM (#1031833)

    Blah, blah, blah. Maybe this, maybe that. Could do this, could do that. It might work, it might not work. It might be possible, it may not be possible. It might do this, it might do that. It could go this way, or it could go that way. Yadda, yadda, yadda...

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:51PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:51PM (#1031853)

      Spotted the FIBD casualty.

      * Fox induced brain damage

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:42PM (7 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:42PM (#1031844)

    So as long as you get vaccinated it doesnt matter which vaccine you use?

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:16PM (6 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:16PM (#1031868)

      Provided the vaccine works. There is a LOT of political pressure to get a vaccine out in October (whether it works or not), so that the administration can claim victory before the election and say the problem is fixed (because of tremendous leadership from the top). If one does come out, I think I will wait and see if it actually more than just a MAGA placebo pill (or worse, one that actually causes bad side effects).

      • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:15PM (2 children)

        by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:15PM (#1031922)

        There is a LOT of political pressure to get a vaccine out in October (whether it works or not)

        I'm having trouble understanding this high-level description of the political/medical/temporal correlation of vaccine availability. Can you describe this in a way that our poorly-alpha-tested-text-synthesizer-in-chief might?

        • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:22PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:22PM (#1031928)

          Virus fixed before election so Trump can say win.

        • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:20PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:20PM (#1031961)

          ...our poorly-alpha-tested-text-synthesizer-in-chief...

          You know, much like the Covfefe-19 virus, he might one day magically disappear with or without a vaccine, and many people think that when that happens no one will be willing to pay the drug companies - and they make the best drugs - beautiful drugs - for the vaccines. Look, nobody has done as much as he has for the ones dying from Covfefe-19 - ever - not the Chinese - not the Italians - and what did Iran do? But the job he did was amazing - but the lame-stream media will never report it. Maybe somebody should investigate that.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:10PM (2 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:10PM (#1031956)

        So I can get a tubercolosis vaccine or a measles vaccine or a flu vaccine and it still works against covid?

        • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:02PM (1 child)

          by HiThere (866) on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:02PM (#1032523) Journal

          Maybe. And for some *really* limited definition of "works".

          This is a theory based on limited data. It's not totally unreasonable, but it sure doesn't count as proven. And even so different vaccines might have different degrees of effectiveness for suppressing *this* mechanism of turning a bad case into a worse case.

          --
          Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2020, @05:03AM

            by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 07 2020, @05:03AM (#1032746)

            Thanks, is there a law against going to different doctors and getting each twice?

  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:47PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:47PM (#1031849)

    From TFA
    If adults got the MMR as a child they likely still have some level of antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella, but probably not the myeloid-derived suppressor cells,” said Dr. Fidel. “While the MDSCs are long-lived, they are not life-long cells. So, a booster MMR would enhance the antibodies to measles, mumps, and rubella and reinitiate the MDSCs.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @04:15PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @04:15PM (#1032300)

      Vaccine cucks can fuckoff, I got my immunity the natural way.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:56PM (20 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @05:56PM (#1031858)

    COVID-19 has not had a big impact on children, and the researchers hypothesize that one reason children are protected against viral infections that induce sepsis is their more recent and more frequent exposures to live attenuated vaccines

    Fine, now... there's supposed to be a big population of non-vaccinated children out there, how does their COVID response compare to their vaccinated counterparts?

    --
    🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:05PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:05PM (#1031861)

      Put all the variables in a big matrix, invert the matrix = get the answers.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:06PM (16 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @06:06PM (#1031863)

      Yep, came to say something similar, anti-vaxxers have had a field day with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine [wikipedia.org] As the statistics become more clear, perhaps it will be possible to look for more correlation between severity of covid and when/if MMR vaccination was done.

      When a vaccine for CV-19 arrives, it will be interesting to see how many of the anti-vax parents take it (although denying their kids the normal childhood vaccines).

      More reading -- https://www.sciencealert.com/anti-vaxxers-seize-virus-moment-to-spread-fake-news [sciencealert.com]

      • (Score: 2) by Kilo110 on Wednesday August 05 2020, @07:24PM (15 children)

        by Kilo110 (2853) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @07:24PM (#1031902)

        they probably won't take it. I read somewhere a month ago that a survey said something like 30% of people won't take a covid vaccine even if offered free.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @07:56PM (4 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @07:56PM (#1031913)

          I would not take version 1.0 but I would take version 3.0. I want all the kinks to be worked out before I take it.

          I would't mind taking a measles vaccine though, it's been around long enough for its safety to have been well established.

          • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:05PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:05PM (#1031919)

            Why do you want to become autistic?

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:31PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:31PM (#1031966)

              Because you get pizza on Tuesdays.

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:59PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:59PM (#1031948)

            In the US, version 1.0 is going to be given to minorities:

            Agency officials and the advisers are also considering what has become a contentious option: putting Black and Latino people, who have disproportionately fallen victim to COVID-19, ahead of others in the population.

            https://www.baltimoresun.com/coronavirus/ct-nw-nyt-covid-19-vaccine-race-20200709-37nkwjzk6reypp6d3alkazy34u-story.html [baltimoresun.com]

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:38PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:38PM (#1032020)

              They always test on animals before moving on to Phase 2 trials on humans.

        • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:17PM (8 children)

          by krishnoid (1156) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:17PM (#1031924)

          Yeah, I hear that stuff gives you COVID. No wait, autism. No wait, 5G.

          Actually, I'd *really* like to see the demographic/geographical breakdown of that number.

          • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:23PM (7 children)

            by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @08:23PM (#1031930)

            Can I give my phone a vaccine and get 5G? Where do I sign up?

            --
            🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
            • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:36PM (1 child)

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:36PM (#1031993)

              Can I give my phone a vaccine and get 5G? Where do I sign up?

              5G?
              If you can get me a 4G vaccine for my phone I'd be happy...hell, I'd even be happy with one which would give me a stable 3G connection...

              I'm not, by nature, anti vaccination, *but* there's something so inherently fscking sketchy about this whole Covid debacle, and when smarmy greasy little cnuts like Gates are involved in peddling vaccines, I'll be buggered if I'll be partaking of it..

              (For the record, caught the bug early March from someone who'd caught it from someone who'd caught it in Italy and brought it back here...)

               

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:49PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:49PM (#1032027)

                > (For the record, caught the bug early March from someone who'd caught it from someone who'd caught it in Italy and brought it back here...)

                Please tell us more. What, if any, symptoms, side effects, timing, etc.

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:02PM (4 children)

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:02PM (#1032003)

              Wait wait ... wouldn't you want to vaccinate your phone AGAINST 5G so that you won't get COVID?

              • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:04PM

                by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:04PM (#1032004)

                Come to think of it doing this might give your phone autism ...

              • (Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:53PM

                by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <reversethis-{moc.liamg} {ta} {eldnahexa}> on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:53PM (#1032029)

                Wait wait ... wouldn't you want to vaccinate your phone AGAINST 5G so that you won't get COVID?

                No, it's not the way it works. You vaccinate YOURSELF against 5G, not your phone. You DO want a 5G infected phone so that the COVID-19 virus ignores you and heads straight for your phone instead.

                --
                It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
              • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday August 06 2020, @01:09AM (1 child)

                by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday August 06 2020, @01:09AM (#1032069) Journal
                Sounded to me like vaccinating your phone so it gets 5G. What could go wrong?
                • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @02:20AM

                  by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @02:20AM (#1032087)

                  You would get COVID.

                  The logic goes like this

                  5G causes COVID.

                  Vaccinations cause autism.

                  If you vaccinate your phone against 5G the phone won't get 5G but it might get autism. But at least you won't get COVID from your phone's 5G and you won't be the one to get autism because it's your phone that's being vaccinated.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:03PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:03PM (#1031951)

          Personally, it would depend on the exact vaccine you are talking about. There are different benefits and drawbacks to all of them. But then again, I've actually read the study results, their ingredients, mechanism of action, and more.

    • (Score: 1, Offtopic) by Bot on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:30PM (1 child)

      by Bot (3902) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:30PM (#1031964) Journal

      One nurse in a city 50 miles from here faked the vaccination procedure for over 500 children, went to national news. Nobody cared to publish stats about the difference between vaxxed and unvaxxed in terms of health in the intervening months. In fact, she was found out not because the lil guys fell more ill or harder, but because the colleagues noticed those kids didn't cry after getting the vaccine.
      So, I don't think that many comparative stats will get out.

      Another data point, SIDS (unexplained death for children) decline during lockdown. Some antivaxxers say: SIDS went down, vaccinations went down, interesting correlation ain't it?
      Local debunking sites answer: your data is anecdotal, plus there is a study in 2018 that says that SIDS and vax are uncorrelated. So, basically an ad hominem and an argument ab auctoritate. Uhmmm, debunking by citing stats who say SIDS did not in fact go down are missing, so they didn't. https://www.oltre.tv/sids-e-vaccinazioni-grafici-lockdown-genitori/ [oltre.tv]
      So, I don't think that anybody cares about SIDS either.

      --
      Account abandoned.
      • (Score: 4, Informative) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:54PM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:54PM (#1031975)

        I don't think that many comparative stats will get out.

        I don't either, and that's what pisses me off about "faith science," which is most of what gets published mainstream, and even in peer reviewed journal articles. We're scientists, trust us.

        I worked with NICHD on a pretty big SIDS study in the early 90s. They were trying to use the study to prove that infant apnea monitors were useless, but we showed up at the RFP with an apnea monitor that DID work. Amazingly, they used our monitors, but, the study got recalibrated to have fewer participants to ensure that it did not endorse our product as effective. I forget the exact stats, I think there were ~500 high risk infants enrolled, we did have 2 or 3 SIDS deaths in the study, but none were monitored at the time, at least one was heavily suspected of being Munchausen by proxy (had multiple siblings also die of SIDS). We had ZERO deaths on monitor, I saw several traces where we detected a prolonged apnea, sounded the VERY LOUD alarm and the baby gasped and started breathing again. The upshot of that whole study was: back to sleep. Parents believe that infants may choke on vomit if they are put on their backs to sleep, but apparently putting them on their face is worse due to a combination of CO2 trapping and an under-developed sense of elevated CO2 levels in infants which is worsened by a head-tilted-back posture that apparently reduces blood circulation to a brain center involved in CO2 sensing. Babies that vomit into their windpipe respond and almost always correct without assistance, but a significant number of babies placed face down will suffocate in their own CO2 because they don't sense that it is happening - and it's a quiet death so even a vigilant caregiver can miss it.

        As for SIDS down during lockdown, that could be as simple as unemployment: parents less beat dog tired pay more attention to their infants.

        I believe Wakefield was... not a good man, and that his results were unreliable/overstated/self-serving, but... the resulting rebuttal studies that were rushed to publication did more to undermine my faith in the scientific community than any other single event (and there have been a lot of them over the years.)

        All in all, the scientific community is still a better one to follow than nationalism, religion, racism, or whatever other options we have out there, but... there is a whole lot of "science" out there with very flimsy clothing hiding the raging boner agendas underneath.

        --
        🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:37PM (4 children)

    by Bot (3902) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:37PM (#1031968) Journal

    >The milder symptoms seen in the 955 sailors on the U.S.S Roosevelt who tested positive for COVID-19 (only one hospitalization) may have been a consequence of the fact that the MMR vaccinations are given to all U.S. Navy recruits.

    LOL surely it's not because to be onboard you must be rather young, very fit and healthy, is it? unless they specifically took these factors into account which I wouldn't count on.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by ilsa on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:59PM (1 child)

      by ilsa (6082) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:59PM (#1031983)

      Next line:
      "In addition, epidemiological data suggest a correlation between people in geographical locations who routinely receive the MMR vaccine and reduced COVID-19 death rates."

      So it sounds like they've already looked for, and found, corroborating evidence.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Bot on Thursday August 06 2020, @07:00AM

        by Bot (3902) on Thursday August 06 2020, @07:00AM (#1032173) Journal

        Well in Italy with Bergamo there is a strong inverse correlation instead. A. Inverse correlation very common in my anecdotal statistical bubble. But if your own bubble says differently, by all means follow it. This way our collective behaviour will be statistically correct on average.

        --
        Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:54PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:54PM (#1032000)

      Maybe buttsex protects you too?

      • (Score: 2) by Bot on Thursday August 06 2020, @07:02AM

        by Bot (3902) on Thursday August 06 2020, @07:02AM (#1032174) Journal

        Surely dieing of aids removes you from COVID stats. Or not, give COVID stats are more inflated than hemorrhoids.

        --
        Account abandoned.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by ilsa on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:58PM (5 children)

    by ilsa (6082) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @09:58PM (#1031981)

    So basically anti-vaxxers are losing out twice because not only are they at risk of contracting measles, etc, but they are also more likely to be severely affected by covid. And of course, they won't get the eventual covid vaccine either cause... vaccines.

    Covid is turning out to be the worlds greatest IQ test. I wish I could be smug about it, but the needless collateral damage caused by these morons really sours the schadenfreude.

    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:08PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:08PM (#1031988)

      Dont most antivaxxers kids get measles? They are probably more immune to covid since they will have a stronger immune response than to the vaccine (which mimics mild illness). Also if they hang out with other people who get measles that will be like regular booster shots for them.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by Taibhsear on Thursday August 06 2020, @12:35PM

        by Taibhsear (1464) on Thursday August 06 2020, @12:35PM (#1032227)

        That's not how that works. Also the stronger immune response is what causes most of the damage in covid infection.

    • (Score: 2) by Opportunist on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:11PM (1 child)

      by Opportunist (5545) on Wednesday August 05 2020, @10:11PM (#1031989)

      Covid is already the world's greatest IQ test.

      • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:14PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:14PM (#1032011)

        Yes, if you listen to the WHO you die.

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:47PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 05 2020, @11:47PM (#1032026)

      Covid is turning out to be the worlds greatest IQ test.

      No it is the basic math test. The one that the "educated" populace totally failed.
      Maybe counting their debts will reacquaint them with arithmetics; maybe not.

      I wish I could be smug about it, but that would require learning to count

      FTFY

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @03:06AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 06 2020, @03:06AM (#1032111)

    I wonder if there's a relation.

    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:12PM

      by HiThere (866) on Thursday August 06 2020, @10:12PM (#1032531) Journal

      That's not what was claimed. What was claimed was recent childhood diseases (of particular types) might act to suppress converting a bad case of COVID into a worse case.

      So it would be interesting to see if people with shingles are less likely to get a bad case of COVID.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(1)