The Fall of Travis Kalanick Was a Lot Weirder and Darker Than You Thought
A year ago, before the investor lawsuits and the federal investigations, before the mass resignations, and before the connotation of the word "Uber" shifted from "world's most valuable startup" to "world's most dysfunctional," Uber's executives sat around a hotel conference room table in San Francisco, trying to convince their chief executive officer, Travis Kalanick, that the company had a major problem: him.
[...] [A] top executive excused herself to answer a phone call. A minute later, she reappeared and asked Kalanick to step into the hallway. Another executive joined them. They hunched over a laptop to watch a video that had just been posted online by Bloomberg News: grainy, black-and-white dashcam footage of Kalanick in the back seat of an UberBlack on Super Bowl weekend, heatedly arguing over fares with a driver named Fawzi Kamel. "Some people don't like to take responsibility for their own shit!" Kalanick can be heard yelling at Kamel. "They blame everything in their life on somebody else!"
As the clip ended, the three stood in stunned silence. Kalanick seemed to understand that his behavior required some form of contrition. According to a person who was there, he literally got down on his hands and knees and began squirming on the floor. "This is bad," he muttered. "I'm terrible." Then, contrition period over, he got up, called a board member, demanded a new PR strategy, and embarked on a yearlong starring role as the villain who gets his comeuppance in the most gripping startup drama since the dot-com bubble. It's a story that, until now, has never been fully told.
The article discusses a number of Uber and Kalanick scandals/events, including:
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 19 2018, @06:53PM (3 children)
This is a good example of why wealth inequality is such a fucked up thing. It doesn't matter much these days how messed up someone is, if they can get rich all gets forgiven as they spread their money around. Why does he get to live like a king? For being a fucked up human being?
Come on uzzy and jmo, let's hear your platitudes about why we need to maintain this farce.
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday January 19 2018, @07:28PM (2 children)
You reward the people who made you a lot of money, as an incentive for others to work with you and make you a lot of money.
The criteria that matters is "how much money", because the smart investor doesn't get caught up in the row about the person's flaws and shameful business practices.
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday January 19 2018, @07:39PM
You correctly identify the reason such messed up people get so ridiculously rewarded. But it's still messed up.
People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Friday January 19 2018, @08:47PM
Which leads to the obvious question: Who should be caught up in the row about a person's shameful business practices? I've got a candidate: Government regulators and law enforcement. But no, that's big government, we can't have that.
And now you know why big businesses love all the "small government" talk: It means laws aren't being enforced, which means that they can more easily get away with crime.
"Think of how stupid the average person is. Then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." - George Carlin