SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
posted by
NCommander
on Friday June 27 2014, @06:15PM
from the finally-an-NCommander-post-with-<1k-words! dept.
from the finally-an-NCommander-post-with-<1k-words! dept.
So, given we've recently managed to find a good middle ground on the subscription front, I thought it would be nice to end the week with a lighthearted subject most of you care about.
STATISTICS!
As most of you are likely aware, we've been running piWik on SN for the last few weeks to get a better idea of what our general traffic looks like. We've learned quite a few interesting things from it, and I figured the community would love to take a look at the report itself. So, without further ado: piWik Statistics Report for mid-June. (warning: PDF file, the HTML output had far too many images to easily copy it off piWik and rehost it somewhere else, and there was no ASCII report that I could find).So, hopefully now most of you have taken a good look through the PDF. Its been fascinating watching the various trends of traffic, as well as getting an idea of the breakdown of mobile/desktop, various OS usage, and so-forth. First, a couple of notes:
STATISTICS!
As most of you are likely aware, we've been running piWik on SN for the last few weeks to get a better idea of what our general traffic looks like. We've learned quite a few interesting things from it, and I figured the community would love to take a look at the report itself. So, without further ado: piWik Statistics Report for mid-June. (warning: PDF file, the HTML output had far too many images to easily copy it off piWik and rehost it somewhere else, and there was no ASCII report that I could find).So, hopefully now most of you have taken a good look through the PDF. Its been fascinating watching the various trends of traffic, as well as getting an idea of the breakdown of mobile/desktop, various OS usage, and so-forth. First, a couple of notes:
- For whatever reason, piWik groups Ubuntu separately from Linux, and it shows up as "Unknown" in the OS families list. I think this is a side-effect from one of the plugins we're using, but I'm not 100% sure.
- Second, there are no referrals listed in the report; I specifically excluded them. There are two simple reasons: we get almost no inbound traffic from third-party sources (our top referral was Google searches at 114), and secondly, a fair number of users here have custom launch portals for themselves (basically an HTML page with links), who, due to our virtually non-existent referrals, show up in the top 25.
- HTTPS traffic is excluded due to certificate issues, as there are users who have DNT set. If you use NoScript, it sets DNT automatically, even if you enable scripts globally. Furthermore, my original post about non-JS users being excluded was in error, there is a hidden image that cause those users to show up.
- A few pages on the site don't include the footer template, causing hits to be slightly lower than they should be because of that.
So, with any bunch of data, we can start to draw some reasonable conclusions from it. Here's what I got, I'd love to hear your opinions below:
- Slashcode's internal statistics monitor is badly out of touch of reality; it reports our traffic is 80% higher than piWik does. This might be an artificat of bitrot, varnish, or something else entirely.
- I was kinda shocked to see how much of our traffic is based in the United States, I honestly though we had a more even distribution.
- The lack of referrals is concerning; right now, we're roughly stable with the users in our community, but if you don't already know we exist, you aren't going to find us easily.
There's probably a lot more I could draw from this data, but I don't want to color the communities' impressions beside stating the obvious, so I'd like to hear what you think about it, and then go from there.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
SoylentNews Site Stats: June 27th, 2014
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 78 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Long life is in store for you.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday June 27 2014, @06:51PM
Even IE 8.0 by itself still beats Opera's most popular...
I like the Opera concept, I like that they're still out there swinging away - though I have to wonder if they might make more contribution to the world by joining Firefox or Chrome development and making their noise closer to the mainstream party?
🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
(Score: 1) by richtopia on Friday June 27 2014, @07:23PM
I suspect that Opera would have fared better a year ago before the shift to Blink. It has really divided the community and continues to drive people away. If you look at browser versions you can see that Opera 12 still has more users than Opera 22.
(Score: 1) by Kunasou on Friday June 27 2014, @08:09PM
Switching to Blink was a bad decision, I still use Opera 12.16 and I'm surprised some people on this website still uses it.
(Score: 2) by n1 on Friday June 27 2014, @09:13PM
This editor still uses Opera primarily, although the Blink change is making me seriously consider going back to Firefox as my main browser. Maybe the cycle will continue and in a few years i'll be back on Opera when Firefox goes to shit again. Software is always one version away from being worthless.
(Score: 2) by paulej72 on Saturday June 28 2014, @01:59AM
Shit again, Firefox is getting shitty now. It is trying too hard to be Chrome. Try to find the preferences on the newest version without turning on the menu again. If it wasn't for the great built-in dev tools, I would really be thinking of switching to something else.
Team Leader for SN Development