Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.

Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password


Site News

Join our Folding@Home team:
Main F@H site
Our team page


Funding Goal
For 6-month period:
2022-07-01 to 2022-12-31
(All amounts are estimated)
Base Goal:
$3500.00

Currently:
$438.92

12.5%

Covers transactions:
2022-07-02 10:17:28 ..
2022-10-05 12:33:58 UTC
(SPIDs: [1838..1866])
Last Update:
2022-10-05 14:04:11 UTC --fnord666

Support us: Subscribe Here
and buy SoylentNews Swag


We always have a place for talented people, visit the Get Involved section on the wiki to see how you can make SoylentNews better.

Which musical instrument can you play, or which would you like to learn to play?

  • piano or other keyboard
  • guitar
  • violin or fiddle
  • brass or wind instrument
  • drum or other percussion
  • er, yes, I am a professional one-man band
  • I usually play mp3 or OSS equivalents, you insensitive clod
  • Other (please specify in the comments)

[ Results | Polls ]
Comments:23 | Votes:69

posted by martyb on Thursday April 21 2016, @11:29PM   Printer-friendly
from the imagine-the-possibilities dept.

The proposed radio frequency (RF) resonant cavity thruster is unlike conventional thrusters and uses no reaction mass and emits no directional radiation. Designed using principles that are not supported by prevailing scientific theories, it apparently violates the law of conservation of momentum. The EmDrive, has roiled the aerospace world for the several years now, ever since it was proposed by British aerospace engineer Robert Shawyer. The essence of the claim is that by bouncing microwaves in a truncated cone, thrust will be produced out the open end. Most scientists have snorted at the idea, noting correctly that such a thing would violate physical laws. However, prestigious organizations like NASA have replicated the results showing thrusts.

MIT Technology Review has some reasoning on the subject, (possibly pay-walled) with a picture of the device. It's supposedly the so called unruh effect at play. When NASA tested the device, they measured with input of 17 W an average thrust of 91 µN (5.4 µN/W). A Chinese team used 2500 W and measured a thrust of 720 mN (288 µN/W). The expected radiation pressure is closer to 0.003 µN/W.


Original Submission

posted by martyb on Thursday April 21 2016, @09:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the invest-in-mosquito-nets-and-DEET dept.

New research has found that over 2 billion people live in parts of the world where the Zika virus can spread via mosquitoes:

More than two billion people live in parts of the world where the Zika virus can spread, detailed maps published in the journal eLife show. The Zika virus, which is spread by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, triggered a global health emergency this year. Last week the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed that the virus causes severe birth defects.

The latest research showed mapping Zika was more complex than simply defining where the mosquito can survive. One of the researchers, Dr Oliver Brady from the University of Oxford, told the BBC: "These are the first maps to come out that really use the data we have for Zika - earlier maps were based on Zika being like dengue or chikungunya. "We are the first to add the very precise geographic and environmental conditions data we have on Zika." By learning where Zika could thrive the researchers could then predict where else may be affected. The researchers confirmed that large areas of South America, the focus of the current outbreak, are susceptible.

To put that in perspective, a recent estimate states: "The world population (the total number of living humans on Earth) was 7.349 billion as of July 1, 2015 according to the medium fertility estimate by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. "

Related:
El Salvador Advises Against Pregnancy until 2018 over Zika Virus Birth Defect Fears
World Health Organization to Convene Emergency Meeting for Zika Virus
WHO Calls Zika Virus Outbreak an International Health Emergency
First U.S. Zika Virus Transmission Reported, Likely via Sex Rather than Mosquito Bite
Maybe “It’s Not the Zika Virus”
Pope Francis's Plane Reports Laser Incident
Zika Virus and Birth Defects


Original Submission

posted by martyb on Thursday April 21 2016, @08:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the TORpedoed dept.

An FBI operation that installed spyware from a seized server to reveal the addresses of Tor users may be undermined by a failure to obtain the correct warrant:

A ruling by a US federal judge could unravel as many as 1,200 criminal prosecutions of alleged pedophiles by the FBI. Massachusetts District Court Judge William Young today declared that the magistrate judge who issued a warrant authorizing the FBI to infect suspects' PCs with tracking malware lacked the proper authority to do so. In early 2015, the Feds had used the warrant to install a so-called NIT – a Network Investigative Technique – on the computers of people who visited a website hidden in the Tor network that hosted a huge archive of photos and videos of child sex abuse.

[...] "It follows that the resulting search was conducted as though there were no warrant at all," Judge Young said in his ruling [PDF]. "Since warrantless searches are presumptively unreasonable, and the good-faith exception is inapplicable, the evidence must be excluded." [...] According to Judge Young, the problem with the warrant was that it was signed by a US magistrate judge, who only had the jurisdiction to authorize warrants in his local area. Collecting evidence outside of that area, which the FBI surely did with the NIT, can only be done with the authorization of a district judge. This is where things will be particularly frustrating for the Feds, as it turns out the federal judges who could have properly authorized the search were likely just yards away when the NIT warrant was signed.

Also at Reuters and TechCrunch.


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @06:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the put-away-your-parka dept.

CBS News and Xinhua write about a report from the NOAA about the average global temperature and the Arctic sea ice cover during March. At 54.9° Fahrenheit (12.7° Celsius), the average was the warmest yet observed for March and "continues a record streak that started last May." The NOAA report says:

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, March set another heat record for the globe. As Earth continues to warm and is influenced by phenomena such as El Niño, global temperature records are piling up.

For 2016 year to date (January-March), the average temperature for the globe was 2.07 degrees F above the 20th-century average, according to scientists from NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information. This was the highest temperature for this period in the 1880–2016 record, surpassing the previous record set in 2015 by 0.50 degrees F. The globally averaged sea surface temperature for the year to date was also highest on record, surpassing the same period in 1998 by 0.42 degrees F, the last time a similar strength El Niño occurred.

For March, the average temperature for the globe was 2.20 degrees F above the 20th century average. This was not only the highest for the month of March in the 1880-2016 record, but also the highest monthly temperature departure among all months on record, surpassing the previous all-time record set last month by 0.02 degrees F. March also marked the 11th consecutive month a monthly global temperature record has been broken, and is the longest such streak in NOAA's 137-year climate record.

The Arctic was also impacted by record global heat. Arctic sea ice reached its maximum extent for the year at 5.61 million square miles March 24, the lowest annual maximum extent in the satellite record. This was 431,000 square miles below average and 5,000 square miles below the previous record from 2015.


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @04:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the always-sunny-in-San-Francisco dept.

San Francisco will require new buildings (2017 and onwards) to have solar panels installed, in an effort to meet its goal of meeting electrical demands with 100% renewable energy:

San Francisco will soon begin requiring new buildings to have solar panels installed on the roof. It's the first major U.S. city to have such a requirement, according to Scott Weiner, the city supervisor who introduced the bill.

The ordinance, which was passed unanimously by the city's Board of Supervisors, builds on an existing California law requiring new buildings to set aside 15 percent of the roof as "solar ready" — clear and unshaded. That law applies to residential and commercial buildings 10 stories or shorter. Now, instead of just preparing the roof for solar panels, such buildings would need to actually install some form of solar energy — either electricity-generating panels or solar heating units.

SolarCity's stocks rose 7.8% on the news. Also at the SF Examiner.


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @03:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the fission-gone-wrong dept.

Various media outlets mark the 30th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster with stories.

  • The Daily Mail (archived copy) reports on of the New Safe Confinement, which is being built off-site.
  • The New Zealand Herald reports on tourism.
  • AFP via Yahoo! 7 News considers lessons learned.
  • The British Journal of Photography remarks on the book Chernobyl Legacy by photographer Paul Fusco, who documented "deformities and diseases" among people in the area.
  • National Geographic writes about the proliferation of wild animals.
  • The Guardian has an essay on the political effects of the disaster.
  • The New Statesman reviews the book Chernobyl Prayer by Svetlana Alexievich.
  • WTSP-TV presents a time-line.
  • WUSA-TV interviews one of the liquidators.
  • Belarus Digest says that "over 500,000 people in Belarus" suffer from thyroid problems.
  • WTTW-TV interviews an artist born in Poland soon after the disaster, whose work is part of the exhibition "Chornobyl: Impact & Beyond" being shown in Chicago.
  • The Irish Times interviews Adi Roche of the NGO Chernobyl Children International, who will speak to the UN General Assembly about the liquidators, by arrangement with the Belarussian government.
  • AOL News interviews a 90-year-old man who lives on the outskirts of the exclusion zone.

Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @01:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the cheating-the-consumer dept.

Volkswagen Reaches Deal to Buy Back Up to 500,000 Diesel Cars

Volkswagen has reached a deal that could allow it to spend billions in order to buy back diesel vehicles sold with "defeat devices":

Volkswagen and US officials have reached a deal under which the car maker could offer to buy back up to 500,000 diesel cars in the US, according to reports. The German car giant has also agreed a compensation fund for owners. VW is expected to reveal the deal to a Federal judge in San Francisco on Thursday. A VW spokeswoman, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Justice Department declined to comment.

Volkswagen could also offer to repair diesel vehicles if US regulators approve a fix at a future date, reports said. US District Judge Charles Breyer in March gave VW until Thursday "to announce a concrete proposal for getting the polluting vehicles off the road."

Mitsubishi Motors Admits Falsifying Fuel Economy Tests

BBC reports:

Mitsubishi Motors has admitted falsifying fuel economy data for more than 600,000 vehicles sold in Japan. Tyre pressure figures were falsified by employees to flatter mileage rates, the company said.

Almost 470,000 vehicles that Mitsubishi made for Nissan were affected and the issue was uncovered after Nissan found inconsistencies.

The announcement sent shares in Mitsubishi down more than 15% in Tokyo. Company bosses, including Mitsubishi Motors president Tetsuro Aikawa, bowed deeply at the start of a press conference on Wednesday afternoon in Tokyo.

"The wrongdoing was intentional. It is clear the falsification was done to make the mileage look better. But why they would resort to fraud to do this is still unclear," he said.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @11:36AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-could-possibly-go-wrong dept.

Some Finnish people have built a drone-mounted chainsaw and one can ask what could possibly go wrong? It reminds somehow of the Mantrid Drones if anyone recall those. The drone is capable of sawing fir branches and icicles. So it can actually be of use.

Youtube Clip of the #killerdrone.


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @09:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the cash-is-dead dept.

BBC News reports that U.S. paper money is to feature new artwork.

The $5 note will feature Marian Anderson, Eleanor Roosevelt and Martin Luther King, Jr. on its back and Abraham Lincoln on the front.

The design for the $20 bill will depict Andrew Jackson on the back, and Harriet Tubman on the front. Tubman was the favourite in an online poll conducted by the NGO Women on 20s.

According to a Treasury Department site devoted to the new designs, the $10 bill will also be changed. Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Alice Paul will be shown on the back, with an engraving of Alexander Hamilton remaining on the front.

Related story:
Meet The U.K.'s Cutting-Edge Research Vessel ... Boaty McBoatface?


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @08:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the garbage-in-garbage-out dept.

In February, the White House announced its plan to put $1 billion toward a similar objective—a "Cancer Moonshot" aimed at making research more techy and efficient. But recent studies of the research enterprise reveal a more confounding issue, and one that won't be solved with bigger grants and increasingly disruptive attitudes. The deeper problem is that much of cancer research in the lab—maybe even most of it—simply can't be trusted. The data are corrupt. The findings are unstable. The science doesn't work.

In other words, we face a replication crisis in the field of biomedicine, not unlike the one we've seen in psychology but with far more dire implications. Sloppy data analysis, contaminated lab materials, and poor experimental design all contribute to the problem. Last summer, Leonard P. Freedman, a scientist who worked for years in both academia and big pharma, published a paper with two colleagues on "the economics of reproducibility in preclinical research." After reviewing the estimated prevalence of each of these flaws and fault-lines in biomedical literature, Freedman and his co-authors guessed that fully half of all results rest on shaky ground, and might not be replicable in other labs. These cancer studies don't merely fail to find a cure; they might not offer any useful data whatsoever. Given current U.S. spending habits, the resulting waste amounts to more than $28 billion. That's two dozen Cancer Moonshots misfired in every single year. That's 100 squandered internet tycoons.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/future_tense/2016/04/biomedicine_facing_a_worse_replication_crisis_than_the_one_plaguing_psychology.html


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @06:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the how-much-info-will-we-give-away-today dept.

ZDNet and VentureBeat‎ report on the announcement by Google that version 50 of its Chrome Web browser has been released.

With this version comes, in the company's words,

the end of Chrome's support for Windows XP, as well as Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8, since these platforms are no longer actively supported by Microsoft and Apple.

According to Microsoft, Windows Vista will be in "extended support" until 11 April 2017.


Original Submission

posted by takyon on Thursday April 21 2016, @04:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the fapblock dept.

Pornography Declared "Public Health Crisis" in Utah

BBC News reports on a resolution (non-Javascript version) passed by the legislature and the governor of the U.S. state of Utah, declaring pornography a "public health crisis." Supported by the NGO Fight the New Drug, the resolution ascribes various ill effects to pornography, concluding:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislature of the state of Utah, the Governor concurring therein, recognizes that pornography is a public health hazard leading to a broad spectrum of individual and public health impacts and societal harms.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature and the Governor recognize the need for education, prevention, research, and policy change at the community and societal level in order to address the pornography epidemic that is harming the people of our state and nation.

The people of Utah: "The Governor is a public justice risk!"

Utah Governor Gary Herbert said on his "GovGaryHerbert" Facebook page that "Pornography is a public health crisis. The problem is rampant, yet it thrives in secrecy and silence." He emitted this thought on signing a resolution which says porn is "a public health hazard leading to a broad spectrum of individual and public health impacts and societal harms." In addition, it "perpetuates a sexually toxic environment." The resolution goes on to say "due to advances in technology and the universal availability of the Internet, young children are exposed to what used to be referred to as hard core, but is now considered mainstream, pornography at an alarming rate." The resolution states that pornography "equates violence toward women and children with sex and pain with pleasure, which increases the demand for sex trafficking, prostitution, child sexual abuse images, and child pornography." The resolution affirms "the need for education, prevention, research, and policy change at the community and societal level in order to address the pornography epidemic that is harming the people of our state and nation." In the words of Gov. Gary Herbert, "Today's bills will start an open discussion." The NGO Fight the New Drug supports the resolution and ascribes various ill effects to pornography.

It sure will start a discussion; perhaps there is more to it than the corridors of power can muster? Or, is someone in need of "donations & contributions"?

SJWs and a rigged dating market populated by stressed out people perhaps makes people choose porn as the most resource efficient choice? No social sniping, legal risks, infections, endless stream of bills, time consumption and more stress?

The Consumerist noticed that states "that have enacted conservative legislation on sexuality" consume more porn. The average consumption is the same. Other finds include that adult escort sites are more popular in "blue" states while visitors from the "red" states are more likely to visit wife-swapping sites, adult webcams, and sites about voyeurism. When porn was legalized in Denmark in the 1970s, rape went down significantly. Later studies have shown that the places with the most and best internet connections have the lowest number of rape cases.

Societal and political mental blocks may also make porn the most valuable if not the best source of information on the issues of feelings, love and sex. Because depictions of healthy, well-adjusted sexuality are banned from general media way too often, while violence and death is just fine. And thus the systematic bias continues to implement the law of unintended consequences.

Resolutions are much less likely to touch on issues like GMO, unsound foreign entanglements, dogma schooling, pharma deception, financial robbery, depletion of aquifers, junk food (even in schools), poor educational opportunities, personal freedom restraints, pollution of life-essential resources, etc. So perhaps someone just needed to engage peoples' emotions to keep themselves relevant with or without intention.


takyon: I don't see the need for the alarmist pejorative "SJW" here but I won't be censoring it from this submission. Draw your own conclusions about whether bitstream is right. And technically the resolution does address personal freedom restraint... just in the other direction.

Original Submission #1
Original Submission #2

posted by takyon on Thursday April 21 2016, @03:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the big-goog dept.

Android Antitrust

From ExtremeTech and the European Commission The EU is complaining that:

manufacturers that opt to license Android and get the Google apps cannot then also build their own version of Android for devices — known as an Android fork.

Google is countering with:

allowing forks could cause people to buy incompatible Android devices without realizing it. If you had a Samsung Android phone before and you buy another one, you'd expect it to work with all your apps and services. If Samsung were allowed to sell both standard Android and Android fork devices, you could end up with a phone that doesn't work the way you thought it would. Google certification ensures that Android devices sold to consumers work correctly.

What does the Soylent community think? Is Google in a precarious position here? Android fragmentation is a massive issue, one that manufacturers seem unwilling to address; if Google is found to be in breach of the rules here will this lead to more fragmentation or the status quo?

[Continues...]

The Gloves Are Off: Google Responds to the EU's Antitrust Charges

Straight from xda-developers:

Earlier this week, we reported on a source that indicated that Google was on the verge of being handed an antitrust suit by the European Commission. Today, the rumors came to fruition: the European Commission officially handed Google a "statement of objections" due to their belief that Google was in violation of EU antitrust statutes by abusing its dominant market position to restrict competition. Our previous report covered the gist of the argument laid out against Google, but to summarize:

"The basic gist of all the events leading up to the aforementioned charges starts off with the MADA (Mobile Application Distribution Agreement). One such MADA with Samsung is present here. The MADA dictates that in order to package a Google app in an OEM phone, they must include all of Google's apps and services, as mentioned by Google. This usually extends onto the OEM decision to bundle the Google Play Store on Android, which is an open source OS. So, if you wish to put the Play Store on the device, you need to pre-install the rest of the application suite as well."

In addition, as laid out in the official report itself:

"...if a manufacturer wishes to pre-install Google proprietary apps, including Google Play Store and Google Search, on any of its devices, Google requires it to enter into an "Anti-Fragmentation Agreement" that commits it not to sell devices running on Android forks.

[...] Google has granted significant financial incentives to some of the largest smartphone and tablet manufacturers as well as mobile network operators on condition that they exclusively pre-install Google Search on their devices."

Google was given 12 weeks to organize a response...

However, Google has wasted no time in responding to the Commission's allegations and today has has issued a statement titled "Android's Model of Open Innovation" laying out their argument for why their business practices are not anti-competitive. The statement is short, but it lays out some pretty clear arguments in defense of Google.

  1. First of all, Google states that their partner agreements are simply voluntary and that any OEM can build, modify, and ship Android as they please (and they've pointed to Amazon as an example of this).
  2. Second, Google argues that their Compatibility Test Suite is imperative for the health of the Android ecosystem as it is in the end-user's best interests for apps to work flawlessly across the spectrum of devices on the market.
  3. Next, Google argues that the installation of Google services is entirely voluntary on the part of the OEM and that they can freely ship devices with pre-installed apps from third-parties (such as Microsoft or Facebook).
  4. Google then argues that it is necessary for them to bundle their Google services to offset the R&D costs for Android.
  5. Finally, Google argues that end-users are free to download and install new apps on their own, and they point to apps such as Instagram or Snapchat as examples.

If Google is unable to defend its position, it could face charges up to $7.4 billion in addition to ending its anti-competitive business practices.

All of this makes me wonder, why doesn't Apple have to defend its walled garden? Maybe Google should have never given the OEMs choice...


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday April 21 2016, @01:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the greener-than-last-year dept.

Every year, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (part of the Department of Energy) releases an energy flow chart showing how much and what types of energy were consumed in the U.S. in the past year. In recent years there have mainly been small increases in energy use each year, but in 2015, that trend reversed and Americans actually used less energy than in the previous year.

Compared to 2014, Americans used 0.8 quadrillion BTU (quads) less energy in 2015. A BTU or British Thermal Unit, is a unit of measurement for energy and 3,600 BTU is equivalent to about 1 kilowatt-hour. Natural gas use increased by 3 percent while coal use decreased by 12 percent and it's that shift that could have had the biggest impact on the numbers since natural gas power plants are far more efficient at producing electricity than coal-fired ones.

The better news is that renewable energy use has continued to grow with wind energy use up 5 percent, geothermal up 11 percent and residential solar up 11 percent. The biggest increase was in utility-scale solar use which rose 25 percent thanks to a few major projects finally starting to feed into the grid in 2015.

A mild winter helped, but there were also gains in efficiency and conservation that added up to demand destruction.


Original Submission

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday April 20 2016, @11:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-put-your-hand-in-there dept.

Lasersaur has made their manual available with a bill of materials, build guide and CAD models. "The unit will cut any dense organic material such as plywood and cloth as well as some plastics such as acrylic glass up to 0.5 in (13 mm) thick (depending on the power of the laser tube selected) with up to 100 µm of accuracy."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lasersaur


Original Submission