Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday April 05 2019, @07:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the contains-40%-of-your-RDA-of-acronyms dept.

Intel Launches Wi-Fi 6 AX200 Wireless Network Adapter

Intel has quietly launched its first Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) wireless network adapter, codenamed Cyclone Peak. The new WLAN adapter will deliver up to 2.4 Gbps network throughput when used with a compatible access point, but, like Wi-Fi 6 in general, its main advantage is that it will work better than existing adapters in RF-noisy environments where multiple Wi-Fi networks co-exist.

The Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 is a CNVi WLAN card that supports 802.11ax via 2x2 MU-MIMO antennas over the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. And never found too far from a Wi-Fi card, Intel's AX200 also supports Bluetooth 5.0.

[...] Intel's web-site says that the first Cyclone Peak wireless network adapter has been launched, so the device is available to makers of PCs. Depending on the order, the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 costs Intel's customers from $10 to $17.

One of the commenters linked to this paper about 802.11be, a generation of Extremely High Throughput (EHT) Wi-Fi technology beyond 802.11ax that could offer a maximum throughput of at least 30 Gbps.

Previously: Netgear Introduces its First Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) Routers

Related: Wi-Fi Alliance Rebrands Wi-Fi Standards
Qualcomm Announces 802.11ay Wi-Fi Chips that Can Transmit 10 Gbps Within Line-of-Sight
Intel Promises "10nm" Chips by the End of 2019, and More


Original Submission

Related Stories

Wi-Fi Alliance Rebrands Wi-Fi Standards 18 comments

Wi-Fi Alliance rebrands 802.11ac as Wi-Fi 5, picks 802.11ax as Wi-Fi 6

The Wi-Fi Alliance today announced a significant rebranding of the "802.11" Wi-Fi standards that have long served as a source of potential confusion for users: Going forward, the current 802.11ac standard will be known as Wi-Fi 5, while its successor 802.11ax will be known as Wi-Fi 6, establishing a generational terminology that — like Bluetooth 3, 4, and 5 — will be easier for customers to remember and understand.

[...] Today's announcement is significant not just because of its impact on currently popular Wi-Fi standards, but also on one that's been on the fringe: 802.11ad. Also known as WiGig, 802.11ad notably depends on an extra, 60GHz millimeter wave wireless antenna to boost speeds of compatible devices in the same room as the router. A handful of routers and devices, including wireless VR adapters, have adopted 802.11ad over the past year or two.

But the announcement makes clear that the Wi-Fi Alliance sees 802.11ax, not 802.11ad, as the next stage of Wi-Fi's evolution. 802.11ax has no need for the extra antenna, instead making more efficient use of the 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands already used by 802.11ac — err, Wi-Fi 5. Wi-Fi 6 promises up to 11 Gbps speeds across three or more devices, with a single Wi-Fi 6 device achieving up to 5 Gbps.

In a statement to VentureBeat, the Alliance explained how Wi-Fi 6 and WiGig will coexist:

"Wi-Fi 6 and WiGig, based on 802.11ad and eventually 802.11ay, will continue to evolve in parallel and remain strong complements to one another within the Wi-Fi portfolio of technologies. We fully expect some products to integrate Wi-Fi 6 and WiGig, which will remain a distinct brand to indicate products that support 60 GHz Wi-Fi for multi-gigabit, low-latency connectivity."

Also at Ars Technica, The Verge, and Tom's Hardware.

Related: Wi-Fi Alliance Approves 802.11ah "HaLow" Standard for the 900 MHz Band
D-Link Joins Hands With Microsoft to Give 'Super Wi-Fi' a Push
Intel to Cease Shipments of Current WiGig Products, Focus on WiGig for VR


Original Submission

Qualcomm Announces 802.11ay Wi-Fi Chips that Can Transmit 10 Gbps Within Line-of-Sight 12 comments

Qualcomm's new Wi-Fi chips are meant to rival 5G speeds

Qualcomm is launching a family of chips that can add incredibly high-speed Wi-Fi — at speeds up to 10 gigabits per second — to phones, laptops, routers, and so on. It's the start of a new generation of this super-fast Wi-Fi standard, but it isn't going to be used to speed up your typical web browsing. And whether it catches on at all remains an open question.

[...] WiGig relies on a connection standard known as 802.11ad, which can hit speeds up to 5 gigabits per second over close to 10 meters, according to Dino Bekis, the head of Qualcomm's mobile and compute connectivity group. Qualcomm's latest chips move WiGig up to a new generation of that wireless standard, called 802.11ay, which Bekis says can reach speeds twice as fast, and can do so up to 100 meter away. The Wi-Fi Alliance says the new standard "increases the peak data rates of WiGig and improves spectrum efficiency and reduces latency."

So why not just use this as normal Wi-Fi, given how fast it gets? Because that range is only line-of-sight — when there's literally nothing in the way between the transmitter and the receiver. This high-speed Wi-Fi is based on millimeter wave radio waves in the 60GHz range. That means it's really fast, but also that it has a very difficult time penetrating obstacles, like a wall. That's a problem if you want a general purpose wireless technology.

[...] It's not clear if this will really catch on, though. While there's definitely room for adoption from VR gamers, the earlier version of this tech has found minimal pickup in its couple years on the market. Asus recently made interesting use of it with the ROG Phone, which is designed for gamers. And Qualcomm says it's working with Facebook to use this tech for its Terragraph project, which wirelessly delivers home internet connections.

With 5:1 "visually lossless" compression, 10 Gbps could be enough for 5K @ 120 Hz.

Qualcomm press release.

Also at Engadget.

Related: AMD Acquires Nitero, a Maker of Wireless Chips for VR Headsets
Intel to Cease Shipments of Current WiGig Products, Focus on WiGig for VR
VirtualLink Consortium Announces USB Type-C Specification for VR Headsets
Wi-Fi Alliance Rebrands Wi-Fi Standards


Original Submission

Netgear Introduces its First Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) Routers 6 comments

Netgear Announces Nighthawk RAX80 and RAX120 802.11ax AX6000 Routers

Netgear has announced imminent availability of their first 802.11ax router - the 8-stream Nighthawk RAX80, along with the technical details, pricing, and other information. In addition, they have also unveiled the 12-stream RAX120. While the RAX80 will be available for purchase this month, RAX120 will make it to retail in Q1 2019.

802.11ax has had an uphill adoption curve. Silicon vendors have been announcing draft-compliant chipsets since late 2016 (Quantenna - Q4 2016, Qualcomm - Q1 2017, Broadcom - Q3 2017, Marvell - Q4 2017, and Intel - Q1 2018). Device vendors were not far behind, with Asus going public about its plans to release a router (RT-AX88U) based on the Broadcom platform as early as September 2017. A year after the announcement, the RT-AX88U finally made it to retail at a $350 price point. D-Link also gave a sneak peek into their AX6000 and AX11000 routers based on the Broadcom chipset at the 2018 CES.  In the meanwhile, we have had deployments of the Qualcomm chipset in the carrier gateways from KDDI and NEC in Asia, as well as enterprise access points from Huawei and Ruckus Wireless.

[...] It must be noted that the aim of 802.11ax is not to target peak data-rates, but, improve the aggregate performance over several simultaneously active clients. The OFDMA-enabled[*] simultaneous transmission to several users results in increased efficiency. Thanks to the lowered waiting time, the battery life of client devices also increases.

[*] OFDMA (orthogonal frequency-division multiple access - Wikipedia); not to be confused with OFDM (orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing - Wikipedia.)

Also at The Verge.


Original Submission

Intel Promises "10nm" Chips by the End of 2019, and More 6 comments

CES 2019 Quick Bytes: Consumer 10nm is Coming with Intel's Ice Lake

We've been on Intel's case for years to tell us when its 10nm parts are coming to the mass market. Technically Intel already shipped its first 10nm processor, Cannon Lake, but this was low volume and limited to specific geographic markets. This time Intel is promising that its first volume consumer processor on 10nm will be Ice Lake. It should be noted that Intel hasn't put a date on Ice Lake launching, but has promised 10nm on shelves by the end of 2019. It has several products that could qualify for that, but Ice Lake is the likely suspect.

At Intel's Architecture Day in December, we saw chips designated as 'Ice Lake-U', built for 15W TDPs with four cores using the new Sunny Cove microarchitecture and Gen11 graphics. Intel went into some details about this part, which we can share with you today.

The 15W processor is a quad core part supporting two threads per core, and will have 64 EUs of Gen11 graphics. 64 EUs will be the standard 'GT2' mainstream configuration for this generation, up from 24 EUs today. In order to drive that many execution units, Intel stated that they need 50-60 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which will come from LPDDR4X memory. In order for those numbers to line up, they will need LPDDR4X-3200 at a minimum, which gives 51.2 GB/s. [...] For connectivity, the chips will support Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) if the laptop manufacturer uses the correct interface module, but the support for Wi-Fi 6 is in the chip. The processor also supports native Thunderbolt 3 over USB Type-C, marking the first Intel chip with native TB3 support.

Wi-Fi Alliance Announces Wi-Fi 6E for Devices Operating in the 6 GHz Band 10 comments

Wi-Fi Alliance Announces Wi-Fi 6E Moniker for 802.11ax in the 6 GHz Spectrum

The FCC has been considering the opening up of the 6 GHz band (essentially, the 1.2 GHz unlicensed spectrum span just above the currently used 5 GHz band) for unlicensed operation. Wideband unlicensed channels of 160 MHz and more may become essential to achieve expected performance from 802.11ax, 802.11be, 4G LTE, and 5G NR in unlicensed spectrum. Opening up a continuous 1200 MHz chunk will enable substantial amount of new bandwidth over multiple wide bandwidth channels.

Unfortunately, even though there are no currently unlicensed users of the 6 GHz band, certain fixed wireless point-to-point long-range deployments are licensed to utilize it. Wi-Fi platform vendors such as Qualcomm and Broadcom have been confident of working with those users to prevent any interference. Their key message to the licensed incumbents is that any Wi-Fi deployment in the 6 GHz band would use LPI (low-power indoor) operation and can also implement AFC (automated frequency coordination). LPI operation, for example, may impose restrictions on the total EIRP (effective isotropically radiated power) and PSD (power spectral density) for Wi-Fi devices. This will prevent interference due to low power levels and substantial building losses. In addition, most licensed users of the spectrum have their point-to-point endpoints well above the ground (mounted atop towers and buildings), and devices rated for LPI operation are not likely to affect them. AFC involves the maintenance of a database where licensed users are tracked based on their deployment location, and any unlicensed Wi-Fi usage in that spectrum capable of interfering with the licensed users could automatically shift to a different channel.

The Wi-Fi Alliance is introducing a new terminology to distinguish upcoming Wi-Fi 6 devices that are capable of 6 GHz operation - Wi-Fi 6E. This is essentially the benefits of Wi-Fi 6 / 802.11ax (higher performance in terms of faster data rates as well as lower latency) in the 6 GHz band. Wi-Fi 6E devices are expected to make it to the market relatively quickly after regulatory approval, as it only requires changing the antenna tuning / RF front end on existing devices.

802.11be is likely to become Wi-Fi 7 and also operate in the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz bands.

In retrospect, the new Wi-Fi naming scheme is not that bad. Or at least, it's not as bad as USB yet.

Previously: Wi-Fi Alliance Rebrands Wi-Fi Standards

Related: Netgear Introduces its First Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) Routers
Intel Launches a Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) Wireless Network Adapter


Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by ikanreed on Friday April 05 2019, @07:55PM (5 children)

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 05 2019, @07:55PM (#825085) Journal

    The fact that my neighbors all have ultra-strong antennae broadcasting on every fucking channel crowding out my own signal in my own home. There's too many wifi routers at too high a broadcast power, using too much of the shared spectrum.

    They name their stupid dumbass wastes of bandwith "AT&T-fast" and how do they make it fast? BY FUCKING TRAMPLING ALL OVER SHARED BANDS.

    Tragedy of the fucking commons.

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:04PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:04PM (#825090)

      Reed TFS:

      its main advantage is that it will work better than existing adapters in RF-noisy environments where multiple Wi-Fi networks co-exist.

      • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Friday April 05 2019, @08:15PM

        by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 05 2019, @08:15PM (#825095) Journal

        I guess I missed that line. Sorry.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:18PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:18PM (#825096)

      Solution: social engineer your way inside, get the passwords off their AP, and change their settings. Or just stop paying for internet and use theirs.
      Seriously though, is your AP 802.11ac? The available 5GHz bands should be more than enough for all of you, and your APs should automatically avoid collisions by detecting and avoiding in-use bands. The situation you're describing just shouldn't happen unless you're in an incredibly dense apartment complex or everyone is running g/n class hardware.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @01:14AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 06 2019, @01:14AM (#825223)

      For quite some time they've been focusing on range, but many of us live in apartments where we would be better off with lower power devices that would be subject to interference from fewer devices. Even at my parents house, I see a ridiculous number of access points.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday April 06 2019, @11:01AM

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday April 06 2019, @11:01AM (#825342) Journal

        Well, as we start talking about using bands near 60 GHz or more, the shorter range you crave will be realized.

        Getting 8 or more antennae on a router could also help.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:01PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:01PM (#825089)

    2.4 Gbits in lab condition. Probably 80 Mbits/s in real life, under ideal conditions (10 cm between transmitter and receiver)

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday April 05 2019, @10:26PM (1 child)

      by bob_super (1357) on Friday April 05 2019, @10:26PM (#825158)

      I've speedtested a .ac connection at over 400Mb/s. Next room, about 5m from the box.
      Wired Gig-E to the same box yielded 500Mb/s down. About 20 Euros a month.
      I'm jealous of my usually low-tech dad...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @11:22PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @11:22PM (#825176)

        It depends a lot on the wireless card in the end device - hockey end stuff has multiple antennas, lower end stuff will be 1x1.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday April 05 2019, @08:33PM (2 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 05 2019, @08:33PM (#825099) Journal

    BYTE magazine, April 1980, page 115.

    NEW HIGH-SPEED COMMUNICATIONS BUS: Xerox Corporation recently made a public announcement of a new concept of processor-to-processor communications intended for an office environment. This novel concept is called "Ethernet", and is a result of some of the work being done in their research labs. In this concept, a single coaxial cable is used as a high-speed communications bus between all processors; communication protocol is handled through software or software supplemented by special-purpose hardware. Rumor has it that an Ethernet processor is now being developed by some form of joint arrangement between Xerox and Intel.

    Three years later . . .

    BYTE Magazine, 1983 January issue, page 468

    Intel is the first company to introduce VLSIC (very-large-scale integrated circuits) to interface comptuer equipment to Ethernet local-area networks. Expect 3Com Corporation of Mountain View, California, to introduce shortly its set of integrated circuits. With the availability of these devices, we can expect to see Ethernet options being offered soon on many personal computers.

    Sometimes it is good to look back down the mountain and see how far we've come.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:38PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 05 2019, @08:38PM (#825104)

      My $100 laptop supports 802.11ac. Next one will hopefully have Bluetooth 5 so I can use longer range wireless headphones.

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Snotnose on Friday April 05 2019, @10:53PM

      by Snotnose (1623) on Friday April 05 2019, @10:53PM (#825167)

      Ahhh, back in the day. circa '91/92, wrote an Ethernet driver for an Intel chip to be released RSN (we had advance knowledge). Wrote dummy code for the chip and got my driver working (this was not unusual back then). Chip arrives, serious lag issues in my code.

      Chip had a feature, you could chain together packets to be sent. Once you built a chain you pointed the chip to the first packet and set a master bit to make the chip process that chain. Each packet had a pointer to the next packet, and a bit that said whether or not the next packet was ready to send. Turned out, if you made packet and/or chain, and set the main bit, it took a good half second for the chip to see it and start transmitting the thing. But if you set the packet bit saying the next packet wasn't ready to go, then flipped it, you were golden.

      My solution? Every chain of packets had an empty packet at the end with the "next packet ready" flag set to "nope, not yet". When I had another bunch of packets ready to go I chained them up, set that mt packet's "next packet ready" flag to "yep, have at it", and off they went.

      What made it silver was when the chip came out my solution was in the official errata (uncredited of course). What made it golden was in '94, when I found Linux, I dug into the Ethernet device driver code and yep, there was my solution to the problem. Uncredited of course.

      --
      When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
(1)